The impact of CpG island methylator phenotype and microsatellite instability on tumour budding in colorectal cancer

被引:37
作者
Zlobec, Inti [1 ,2 ]
Bihl, Michel P. [2 ]
Foerster, Anja [2 ]
Rufle, Alex [2 ]
Lugli, Alessandro [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Inst Pathol, TRU, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Basel Hosp, Inst Pathol, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
CIMP; colorectal cancer; methylation; microsatellite instability; tumour budding; PROMOTER METHYLATION; MUTATION; CIMP; CLASSIFICATION; PROGRESSION; PROGNOSIS; PATHWAY; INDEX;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2559.2012.04273.x
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Aims: In colorectal cancer, tumour budding, a process likened to epithelial mesenchymal transition, is an adverse prognostic factor which is rarely found in tumours with high-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H). Cases with MSI-H or high-level CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP-H) have similar histomorphological features, yet seemingly opposite prognosis. We hypothesized that tumour budding is related to CIMP, thus partially explaining this prognostic difference. Methods and results: MSI, KRAS, BRAF, CIMP and 0(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) were investigated in tissues from 127 colorectal cancer patients. Tumour budding was scored using pan-cytokeratin-stained whole tissue sections within the densest area of buds (x40). Tumour budding was not associated with KRAS, BRAF, MGMT or CIMP, but was correlated inversely with MSI-H (P = 0.0049). Multivariate survival time analysis revealed that tumour budding was independent of all five molecular features and was predicted by MSI status [odds ratio (OR): 4.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-12.1; P = 0.006)], but not CIMP (OR: 0.81, 95% CI 0.3-2.5; P = 0.714). Conclusions: These findings underline that MSI, rather than CIMP, plays a role in conferring a tumour budding phenotype. Budding retains its unfavourable prognostic effect independently of these five molecular features. Continued efforts to standardize the assessment of tumour budding are necessary to integrate this feature into daily diagnostic routine.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 787
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Deciphering the etiology and role in oncogenic transformation of the CpG island methylator phenotype: a pan-cancer analysis [J].
Yates, Josephine ;
Boeva, Valentina .
BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2022, 23 (02)
[42]   Chromosomally and microsatellite stable colorectal carcinomas without the CpG island methylator phenotype in a molecular classification [J].
Ostwald, Christiane ;
Linnebacher, Michael ;
Weirich, Volker ;
Prall, Friedrich .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2009, 35 (02) :321-327
[43]   Association between gut microbiota and CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer [J].
Park, Pyoung Hwa ;
Keith, Kelsey ;
Calendo, Gennaro ;
Jelinek, Jaroslav ;
Madzo, Jozef ;
Gharaibeh, Raad Z. ;
Ghosh, Jayashri ;
Sapienza, Carmen ;
Jobin, Christian ;
Issa, Jean-Pierre J. .
GUT MICROBES, 2024, 16 (01)
[44]   Identification of a CpG Island Methylator Phenotype in Adrenocortical Carcinomas [J].
Barreau, Olivia ;
Assie, Guillaume ;
Wilmot-Roussel, Hortense ;
Ragazzon, Bruno ;
Baudry, Camille ;
Perlemoine, Karine ;
Rene-Corail, Fernande ;
Bertagna, Xavier ;
Dousset, Bertrand ;
Hamzaoui, Nadim ;
Tissier, Frederique ;
de Reynies, Aurelien ;
Bertherat, Jerome .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2013, 98 (01) :E174-E184
[45]   BRAF mutation, CpG island methylator phenotype and microsatellite instability occur more frequently and concordantly in mucinous than non-mucinous colorectal cancer [J].
Tanaka, H ;
Deng, GR ;
Matsuzaki, K ;
Kakar, S ;
Kim, GE ;
Miura, S ;
Sleisenger, MH ;
Kim, YS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 118 (11) :2765-2771
[46]   No association of CpG island methylator phenotype and colorectal cancer survival: population-based study [J].
Min Jia ;
Lina Jansen ;
Viola Walter ;
Katrin Tagscherer ;
Wilfried Roth ;
Esther Herpel ;
Matthias Kloor ;
Hendrik Bläker ;
Jenny Chang-Claude ;
Hermann Brenner ;
Michael Hoffmeister .
British Journal of Cancer, 2016, 115 :1359-1366
[47]   Chromosomale Instabilität, Mikrosatelliteninstabilität und „CpG island methylator phenotype“Rolle in der DünndarmkarzinogeneseChromosomal instability, microsatellite instability and CpG island methylator phenotypeRoles in small intestinal carcinogenesis [J].
H. Bläker ;
A. Warth ;
M. Kloor ;
P. Schirmacher .
Der Pathologe, 2011, 32 (Suppl 2)
[48]   Phenotype of microsatellite-stable colorectal carcinomas with CpG island methylation [J].
Chirieac, LR ;
Shen, LL ;
Catalano, PJ ;
Issa, JP ;
Hamilton, SR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 29 (04) :429-436
[49]   DNA methylation subgroups and the CpG island methylator phenotype in gastric cancer: a comprehensive profiling approach [J].
Loh, Marie ;
Liem, Natalia ;
Vaithilingam, Aparna ;
Lim, Pei Li ;
Sapari, Nur Sabrina ;
Elahi, Eiram ;
Mok, Zuan Yu ;
Cheng, Chee Leong ;
Yan, Benedict ;
Pang, Brendan ;
Salto-Tellez, Manuel ;
Yong, Wei Peng ;
Iacopetta, Barry ;
Soong, Richie .
BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 14
[50]   Biological significance of the CpG island methylator phenotype [J].
Suzuki, Hiromu ;
Yamamoto, Eiichiro ;
Maruyama, Reo ;
Niinuma, Takeshi ;
Kai, Masahiro .
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2014, 455 (1-2) :35-42