The gradient of the reinforcement landscape influences sensorimotor learning

被引:32
作者
Cashaback, Joshua G. A. [1 ,2 ]
Lao, Christopher K. [3 ]
Palidis, Dimitrios J. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Coltman, Susan K. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
McGregor, Heather R. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Gribble, Paul L. [3 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Human Performance Lab, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Hotchkiss Brain Inst, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Western Univ, Dept Physiol & Pharmacol, London, ON, Canada
[4] Western Univ, Grad Program Neurosci, London, ON, Canada
[5] Western Univ, Brain & Mind Inst, London, ON, Canada
[6] Western Univ, Dept Psychol, London, ON, Canada
[7] Haskins Labs Inc, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
TASK-IRRELEVANT; DECISION-THEORY; MOTOR; ADAPTATION; MOVEMENT; VARIABILITY; REWARD; REPRESENTATION; MEMORY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006839
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Consideration of previous successes and failures is essential to mastering a motor skill. Much of what we know about how humans and animals learn from such reinforcement feedback comes from experiments that involve sampling from a small number of discrete actions. Yet, it is less understood how we learn through reinforcement feedback when sampling from a continuous set of possible actions. Navigating a continuous set of possible actions likely requires using gradient information to maximize success. Here we addressed how humans adapt the aim of their hand when experiencing reinforcement feedback that was associated with a continuous set of possible actions. Specifically, we manipulated the change in the probability of reward given a change in motor actionthe reinforcement gradientto study its influence on learning. We found that participants learned faster when exposed to a steep gradient compared to a shallow gradient. Further, when initially positioned between a steep and a shallow gradient that rose in opposite directions, participants were more likely to ascend the steep gradient. We introduce a model that captures our results and several features of motor learning. Taken together, our work suggests that the sensorimotor system relies on temporally recent and spatially local gradient information to drive learning. Author summary In recent years it has been shown that reinforcement feedback may also subserve our ability to acquire new motor skills. Here we address how the reinforcement gradient influences motor learning. We found that a steeper gradient increased both the rate and likelihood of learning. Moreover, while many mainstream theories posit that we build a full representation of the reinforcement landscape, both our data and model suggest that the sensorimotor system relies primarily on temporally recent and spatially local gradient information to drive learning. Our work provides new insights into how we sample from a continuous action-reward landscape to maximize success.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] On the Origins of Suboptimality in Human Probabilistic Inference
    Acerbi, Luigi
    Vijayakumar, Sethu
    Wolpert, Daniel M.
    [J]. PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2014, 10 (06)
  • [2] Annis D.H., 2005, Journal of the American Statistical Association, V100, P1457, DOI DOI 10.1198/JASA.2005.S48
  • [3] High variability impairs motor learning regardless of whether it affects task performance
    Cardis, Marco
    Casadio, Maura
    Ranganathan, Rajiv
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 119 (01) : 39 - 48
  • [4] Dissociating error-based and reinforcement-based loss functions during sensorimotor learning
    Cashaback, Joshua G. A.
    McGregor, Heather R.
    Mohatarem, Ayman
    Gribble, Paul L.
    [J]. PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2017, 13 (07)
  • [5] Does the sensorimotor system minimize prediction error or select the most likely prediction during object lifting?
    Cashaback, Joshua G. A.
    McGregor, Heather R.
    Pun, Henry C. H.
    Buckingham, Gavin
    Gribble, Paul L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 117 (01) : 260 - 274
  • [6] The human motor system alters its reaching movement plan for task-irrelevant, positional forces
    Cashaback, Joshua G. A.
    McGregor, Heather R.
    Gribble, Paul L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 113 (07) : 2137 - 2149
  • [7] Environmental Consistency Determines the Rate of Motor Adaptation
    Castro, Luis Nicolas Gonzalez
    Hadjiosif, Alkis M.
    Hemphill, Matthew A.
    Smith, Maurice A.
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (10) : 1050 - 1061
  • [8] Predicting explorative motor learning using decision-making and motor noise
    Chen, Xiuli
    Mohr, Kieran
    Galea, Joseph M.
    [J]. PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2017, 13 (04)
  • [9] Codol O., 2017, 206284 BIORXIV
  • [10] The Role of Variability in Motor Learning
    Dhawale, Ashesh K.
    Smith, Maurice A.
    Olveczky, Bence P.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF NEUROSCIENCE, VOL 40, 2017, 40 : 479 - 498