Deconstructing the construct: A network perspective on psychological phenomena

被引:496
作者
Schmittmann, Verena D. [1 ]
Cramer, Angelique O. J. [1 ]
Waldorp, Lourens J. [1 ]
Epskamp, Sacha [1 ]
Kievit, Rogier A. [1 ]
Borsboom, Denny [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychol, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Psychological construct; Dynamical systems; Latent variable model; Network Formative model; Reflective model; FORMATIVE MEASUREMENT; REFLECTIVE MEASUREMENT; MODEL; MISSPECIFICATION; INDICATORS; BREIVIK; HOWELL; SLEEP;
D O I
10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.02.007
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In psychological measurement, two interpretations of measurement systems have been developed: the reflective interpretation, in which the measured attribute is conceptualized as the common cause of the observables, and the formative interpretation, in which the measured attribute is seen as the common effect of the observables. We advocate a third interpretation, in which attributes are conceptualized as systems of causally coupled (observable) variables. In such a view, a construct like 'depression' is not seen as a latent variable that underlies symptoms like 'lack of sleep' or 'fatigue', and neither as a composite constructed out of these symptoms, but as a system of causal relations between the symptoms themselves (e.g., lack of sleep -> fatigue, etc.). We discuss methodological strategies to investigate such systems as well as theoretical consequences that bear on the question in which sense such a construct could be interpreted as real. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 53
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
[11]  
BOLLEN KA, 1984, QUAL QUANT, V18, P377
[12]   Interpretational confounding is due to misspecification, not to type of indicator: Comment on Howell, Breivik, and Wilcox (2007) [J].
Bollen, Kenneth A. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2007, 12 (02) :219-228
[13]   The theoretical status of latent variables [J].
Borsboom, D ;
Mellenbergh, GJ ;
van Heerden, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2003, 110 (02) :203-219
[14]   The concept of validity [J].
Borsboom, D ;
Mellenbergh, GJ ;
van Heerden, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2004, 111 (04) :1061-1071
[15]  
Borsboom D., 2009, CONCEPT VALIDITY
[16]  
Borsboom D., SMALL WORLD PS UNPUB
[17]   INTERPRETATIONAL CONFOUNDING OF UNOBSERVED VARIABLES IN STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS [J].
BURT, RS .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1976, 5 (01) :3-52
[18]   Formative versus reflective measurement models: Two applications of formative measurement [J].
Coltman, Tim ;
Devinney, Timothy M. ;
Midgley, David F. ;
Venaik, Sunil .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2008, 61 (12) :1250-1262
[19]   Comorbidity: A network perspective [J].
Cramer, Angelique O. J. ;
Waldorp, Lourens J. ;
van der Maas, Han L. J. ;
Borsboom, Denny .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2010, 33 (2-3) :137-+
[20]   CONSTRUCT VALIDITY IN PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS [J].
CRONBACH, LJ ;
MEEHL, PE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1955, 52 (04) :281-302