Property rights, village democracy, and household forestry income: evidence from China's collective forest tenure reform

被引:8
|
作者
Yang, Liu [1 ]
Ren, Yang [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Publ Affairs & Adm, Chengdu, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Property rights; village democracy; forestry income; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; POLICY;
D O I
10.1080/13416979.2020.1854064
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
To investigate the effect of expanded property rights and, in particular, village democracy under China's Collective Forest Tenure Reform (CFTR) on household forestry income, we employ quantile regression, drawing on the survey data from 658 rural households in three provinces belonging to China's southern collective forest regions. The results indicate that: (1) both the expansion of household forestland property rights caused by CFTR and the village democratic procedure involved in the reform exert significant income effect; the income effect intensity of the expansion of forestland use right and disposal right is greater than that of beneficiary right, and the effect shows no significant difference among rural households with different forestry income scale. (2) the village democracy cannot only directly motivate rural household forestry income but also notably moderate the income effect of property rights expansion. Based on the above findings, this paper suggests that the forestland property right policy aimed at rural households be further refined, the rural households' policy awareness of CFTR be enhanced and the grass-roots bureaucratic system be prevented from over-intervening in the implementation of public policy so as to further improve CFTR and enhance rural households' forestry income.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 16
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Property rights, village democracy, and household forestry income: evidence from China’s collective forest tenure reform
    School of Public Affairs and Administration, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
    J. For. Res., 1600, 1 (7-16):
  • [2] Property Rights, Village Political System, and Forestry Investment: Evidence from China's Collective Forest Tenure Reform
    Ren, Yang
    Kuuluvainen, Jari
    Yang, Liu
    Yao, Shunbo
    Xue, Caixia
    Toppinen, Anne
    FORESTS, 2018, 9 (09)
  • [3] Property rights, tenure security and forest investment incentives: evidence from China's Collective Forest Tenure Reform
    Yi, Yuanyuan
    Kohlin, Gunnar
    Xu, Jintao
    ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2014, 19 (01) : 48 - 73
  • [4] The Effect of Collective Forest Tenure Reform on Farmers' Forestry Income: Evidence from Investigation Data
    Huang, Li
    Zhou, Mi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN MANAGEMENT, ARTS AND HUMANITIES SCIENCE (AMAHS 2016), 2016, 63 : 181 - 184
  • [5] Collective action in China's recent collective forestry property rights reform
    Liu, Pingyang
    Ravenscroft, Neil
    LAND USE POLICY, 2016, 59 : 402 - 411
  • [6] Does Property Rights Integrity Improve Tenure Security? Evidence from China's Forest Reform
    Zhou, Yuepeng
    Ma, Xianlei
    Ji, Dengyan
    Heerink, Nico
    Shi, Xiaoping
    Liu, Hongbin
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (06):
  • [7] Does Collective Forest Tenure Reform Improve Forest Carbon Sequestration Efficiency and Rural Household Income in China?
    Zheng, Xixian
    Peng, Ruohan
    Liao, Wenmei
    FORESTS, 2025, 16 (03):
  • [8] The impact of rural collective property rights reform on income and poverty reduction: Evidence from China's rural regions
    Xiang, Qin
    Li, Jingjin
    Liu, Guoyong
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (09):
  • [9] Forest Tenure Reform in China: A Choice Experiment on Farmers' Property Rights Preferences
    Qin, Ping
    Carlsson, Fredrik
    Xu, Jintao
    LAND ECONOMICS, 2011, 87 (03) : 473 - 487
  • [10] China's Collective Forest Tenure Reform and the Future of the Giant Panda
    Yang, Biao
    Busch, Jonah
    Zhang, Li
    Ran, Jianghong
    Gu, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Wen
    Du, Beibei
    Xu, Yu
    Mittermeier, Russell A.
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2015, 8 (04): : 251 - 261