What is important to measure in the last months and weeks of life?: A modified nominal group study

被引:63
作者
Aspinal, Fiona [1 ]
Hughes, Rhidian [1 ]
Dunckley, Maria [1 ]
Addington-Hall, Julia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Dept Polit, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
quality indicators; palliative care; user involvement; nursing; nominal group technique;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.06.005
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Identifying the most important issues for palliative care patients and their families, and assessing whether services address these appropriately is important. Little is known about the views of United Kingdom service users and whether, and in what ways, they differ from those in the published literature from other countries, or from health professionals. Aims: To investigate what is important to measure at the end of life from the perspectives of United Kingdom patients, bereaved relatives and health care professionals. Methods: Ten focus groups, using a modified nominal group technique, with a total of 75 participants (10 patients, 35 professionals and 30 bereaved relatives) enabled issues participants thought important to measure at the end of life to be identified and prioritised using ratings and rankings. Thematic analysis of the data was conducted to enable cross-group comparison. Findings: Seven themes were identified as most important to participants: symptom management; choice and control; dignity; quality of life; preparation; relationships; and co-ordination and continuity. Bereaved relatives and professionals emphasised symptom management, relationships and quality of life, whilst patients prioritised issues around preparation. Conclusions: The study was successful in identifying aspects of end of life care that are important to patients, families and health professionals in the United Kingdom. Although participants were not representative of the wider population in the United Kingdom, the degree of concordance with published studies from outside the United Kingdom increases the credibility of the findings. Quality assurance initiatives need to ensure that they act on information such as this on users' priorities. Further research is needed to test out the findings in other settings in the United Kingdom, to build on the findings about different participants' views and to identify similarities and variations between countries. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 403
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Andersen B, 2000, QUAL PROG, V33, P144
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2003, STRENGTH ACC INV PAT
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, SHIFT BAL POW NEXT S
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2001, INV PAT PUBL HEALTHC
  • [5] Axelsson B, 1999, ACTA ONCOL, V38, P229
  • [6] Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in Washington State - Patient requests and physician responses
    Back, AL
    Wallace, JI
    Starks, HE
    Pearlman, RA
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 275 (12): : 919 - 925
  • [7] WHAT THINGS ARE IMPORTANT IN PEOPLES LIVES - A SURVEY OF THE PUBLICS JUDGMENTS TO INFORM SCALES OF HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY-OF-LIFE
    BOWLING, A
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1995, 41 (10) : 1447 - 1462
  • [8] Carney DN, 1996, SEMIN ONCOL, V23, P5
  • [9] Department of Health, 1998, 1 CLASS SERV QUAL NE
  • [10] Department of Health, 2000, NHS PLAN