Overview and experimental verification of models to classify hazardous areas

被引:11
作者
Alves, Jose J. N. [1 ]
Neto, Antonio T. P. [1 ]
Araujo, Antonio C. B. [1 ]
Silva, Heleno B. [1 ]
Silva, Sidinei K. [1 ]
Nascimento, Claudemi A. [1 ]
Luiz, Aurelio M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Campina Grande, Unidade Acad Engn Quim, Ave Aprigio Veloso, BR-58109970 Campina Grande, Paraiba, Brazil
[2] Petrobras Petr Brasileiro SA, Ave Henrique Valadares 28, BR-20231030 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
关键词
Gas leakage; CFD; Hazardous area; Modeling and simulation; Flammable gas; HIGHLY PRESSURIZED HYDROGEN; CFD SIMULATIONS; GAS DISPERSION; RELEASE; CLASSIFICATION; ATMOSPHERES; SPACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.psep.2018.11.021
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The extent of a hazardous area is the distance over which an explosive atmosphere may occur. The main objective of this study is to investigate the accuracy of mathematical models to determine the extent of hazardous area in industrial facilities where explosive gases are used. The accurate prediction of the extent of a hazardous area is important for both process safety and economy. Underestimating hazardous areas can lead to explosions, and overestimating them incurs unnecessary cost. In this study, the authors compared the extent of hazardous areas predicted using analytical models with those obtained from a computational fluid dynamics CFD model. The latter was verified through experiments, and successfully predicted the characteristic barrel pattern at the exit of the leaking orifice, typical of choked flow. The emission and dispersion of three flammable gases (hydrogen, methane, and ethylene) from five orifices of different diameters under different stagnation conditions were predicted. The results show that the extent of hazardous areas predicted by the analytical models was overestimated, but was accurately predicted by the CFD model. Of the analytical models tested, the models proposed in Italian Guide CEI 31-35 and by Ewan and Moodie yielded the closest results to those of the CFD model. (C) 2018 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 117
页数:16
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, 60079101ED2 IEC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, ANSYS CFX SOLV THEOR
[3]  
Ashkenas H, 1966, AIAA J, V30, P1657
[4]   Influence of scenario choices when performing CFD simulations for explosion risk analyses: Focus on dispersion [J].
Azzi, Camille ;
Rogstadkjernet, Lars ;
van Wingerden, Kees ;
Choi, Jeawoong ;
Ryu, Yonghee .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2016, 41 :87-96
[5]   Laminar jet modelling for hazardous area classification [J].
Benintendi, Renato .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2011, 24 (02) :123-130
[6]   Turbulent jet modelling for hazardous area classification [J].
Benintendi, Renato .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2010, 23 (03) :373-378
[7]   THE STRUCTURE AND CONCENTRATION DECAY OF HIGH-PRESSURE JETS OF NATURAL-GAS [J].
BIRCH, AD ;
BROWN, DR ;
DODSON, MG ;
SWAFFIELD, F .
COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1984, 36 (5-6) :249-261
[8]   A Numerical Analysis of Hydrogen Underexpanded Jets Under Real Gas Assumption [J].
Bonelli, Francesco ;
Viggiano, Annarita ;
Magi, Vinicio .
JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2013, 135 (12)
[9]  
de Nevers Noel., 1970, Fluid Mechanics, V1st
[10]   CFD predictions for hazardous area classification [J].
de Souza, Andrey Oliveira ;
Luiz, Aurelio Moreira ;
Pereira Neto, Antonio Tavernard ;
Brandao de Araujo, Antonio Carlos ;
da Silva, Heleno Bispo ;
da Silva, Sidinei Kehler ;
Nicacio Alves, Jose Jailson .
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 27 (01) :21-31