AED Trials in Newly Diagnosed Patients: Out With the Old Versus New, in With the New Versus New

被引:0
作者
French, Jaqueline A.
机构
关键词
ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGS; EFFICACY; EPILEPSY;
D O I
10.5698/1535-7511-12.4.126
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Efficacious and safe monotherapy options are needed for adult patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. As an adjunctive treatment for partial seizures, pregabalin compares favourably with lamotrigine and is an effective, approved treatment. We studied the efficacy and safety of pregabalin as monotherapy, using a design that complied with European regulatory requirements and International League Against Epilepsy guidelines. METHODS: This phase 3, double-blind, randomised, non-inferiority study compared the efficacy and tolerability of pregabalin and lamotrigine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed partial seizures at 105 centres, mostly in Europe and Asia. Randomisation to treatment groups (1: 1 ratio) was by a computer-generated pseudorandom code (random permuted blocks), with patients sequentially assigned numbers by telephone. Investigators, site staff, and patients were masked to the assigned treatment. After randomisation, patients were titrated to either 75 mg oral pregabalin or 50 mg oral lamotrigine twice daily during a 4-week dose-escalation phase, followed by a 52-week efficacy assessment phase during which the daily dose could be increased as needed to a maximum of 600 mg and 500 mg, respectively. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who remained seizure-free for 6 or more continuous months during the efficacy assessment phase; analysis included all patients who were randomly assigned to treatment groups and received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00280059. FINDINGS: 660 patients were randomly assigned to treatment groups (330 pregabalin, 330 lamotrigine), of whom 622 entered the efficacy assessment phase (314 pregabalin, 308 lamotrigine). Fewer patients in the pregabalin group than in the lamotrigine group became seizure-free for 6 or more continuous months (162 [52%] vs 209 [68%]; difference in proportion, -0.16, 95% CI -0.24 to -0.09). The overall incidence of adverse events was similar between the groups and consistent with that in previous studies; dizziness (55 [17%] vs 45 [14%] patients), somnolence (29 [9%] vs 14 [4%]), fatigue (27 [8%] vs 19 [6%]), and weight increase (21 [6%] vs 7 [2%]) were numerically more common in the pregabalin group than in the lamotrigine group. INTERPRETATION: Pregabalin has similar tolerability but seems to have inferior efficacy to lamotrigine for the treatment of newly diagnosed partial seizures in adults. Inferior efficacy of pregabalin might have been attributable to limitations in the study design, as treatment doses might have not been optimised adequately or early enough.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 127
页数:2
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Agency LEM. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, REC REV NOT GUID CLI
  • [2] Efficacy and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drugs I: Treatment of new onset epilepsy - Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee and Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society
    French, JA
    Kanner, AM
    Bautista, J
    Abou-Khalil, B
    Browne, T
    Harden, CL
    Theodore, WH
    Bazil, C
    Stern, J
    Schachter, SC
    Bergen, D
    Hirtz, D
    Montouris, GD
    Nespeca, M
    Gidal, B
    Marks, WJ
    Turk, WR
    Fischer, JH
    Bourgeois, B
    Wilner, A
    Faught, RE
    Sachdeo, RC
    Beydoun, A
    Glauser, TA
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2004, 62 (08) : 1252 - 1260
  • [3] ILAE treatment guidelines: Evidence-based analysis of antiepileptic drug efficacy and effectiveness as initial monotherapy for epileptic seizures and syndromes
    Glauser, Tracy
    Ben-Menachem, Elinor
    Bourgeois, Blaise
    Cnaan, Avital
    Chadwick, David
    Guerreiro, Carlos
    Kalviainen, Reetta
    Mattson, Richard
    Perucca, Emilio
    Tomson, Torbjorn
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 2006, 47 (07) : 1094 - 1120
  • [4] The SANAD study of effectiveness of carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, or topiramate for treatment of partial epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial
    Marson, Anthony G.
    Al-Kharusi, Asya M.
    Alwaidh, Muna
    Appleton, Richard
    Baker, Gus A.
    Chadwick, David W.
    Cramp, Celia
    Cockerell, Oliver C.
    Cooper, Paul N.
    Doughty, Julie
    Eaton, Barbara
    Gamble, Carrot
    Goulding, Peter J.
    Howell, Stephen J. L.
    Hughes, Adrian
    Jackson, Margaret
    Jacoby, Ann
    Kellett, Mark
    Lawson, Geoffrey R.
    Leach, John Paul
    Nicolaides, Paola
    Roberts, Richard
    Shackley, Phil
    Shen, Jing
    Smith, David F.
    Smith, Philip E. M.
    Smith, Catrin Tudur
    Vanoli, Alessandra
    Williamson, Paula R.
    [J]. LANCET, 2007, 369 (9566) : 1000 - 1015
  • [5] Factors determining response to antiepileptic drugs in randomized controlled trials. A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rheims, Sylvain
    Perucca, Emilio
    Cucherat, Michel
    Ryvlin, Philippe
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 2011, 52 (02) : 219 - 233