Union rate, complication rate, and opioid usage after Vancouver B periprosthetic femur fractures: a comparison of fracture types

被引:5
作者
Malige, Ajith [1 ]
Yeazell, Shawn [1 ]
Beck, Matthew [2 ]
Liongson, Franzes Anne [3 ]
Boateng, Henry [4 ]
Nwachuku, Chinenye [1 ]
机构
[1] St Lukes Univ Hosp, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA
[2] Philadelphia Coll Osteopath Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Temple Univ, Lewis Katz Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[4] Penn State Hlth Hershey Med Ctr, Hershey, PA USA
关键词
Periprosthetic; Femur; Vancouver; Hip; Arthroplasty; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; FEMORAL FRACTURES; RISK-FACTORS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-020-03410-w
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Periprosthetic femur fractures are complex injuries that can be difficult to treat and recover from. With a growing number of total hip arthroplasties (THA) and revision arthroplasties being performed in an aging population, the incidence of these injuries is on the rise. Multiple studies exist detailing outcomes associated with periprosthetic femur fractures after THA, but no study has directly compared the post-operative course between fracture types as classified by the Vancouver classification system. This study compares the three Vancouver B fracture types to see if any type is associated with an increase in post-operative complications than others. Materials and methods This retrospective chart review was conducted at a suburban orthopedic surgery department. Overall, 122 patients who presented to our hospital with periprosthetic proximal femur fractures after hip arthroplasty over the past 13 years were reviewed. Patients were included if they underwent surgical stabilization of their femur fracture. Patients were excluded if they underwent non-operative treatment or had missing chart information. For each patient, demographic information, fracture information, surgical information, post-operative course, and post-operative opioid usage were recorded and compared among groups. Results Overall, 88 fractures were included. Fifty-five (62.5%) were Vancouver type B1, 27 (30.7%) were Vancouver type B2, and 6 (6.8%) were Vancouver type B3. Most of our patients were female (n = 62, 70.5%) and older than 81 years of age (n = 53, 60.2%) with uncemented prosthesis (n = 83, 94.3%). All three fracture groups had statistically similar union rates (p = 0.77), infection rates (p = 0.32), subsequent fractures (p = 0.63), repeat surgeries (p = 0.64), and post-operative opioid use (measured in milli-morphine equivalents) after surgical stabilization (p = 0.96). Conclusions While periprosthetic femur fractures after hip arthroplasty are associated with high complication rates and poor outcomes, there is no difference in union rate, infection rate, subsequent fractures, repeat surgery rate, and opioid usage between the different Vancouver B fracture types.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 22
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Mortality after periprosthetic fracture of the femur [J].
Bhattacharyya, Timothy ;
Chang, Denis ;
Meigs, James B. ;
Estok, Daniel M., II ;
Malchau, Henrik .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 89A (12) :2658-2662
[2]   Isolated locked compression plating for Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures [J].
Bryant, Ginger K. ;
Morshed, Saam ;
Agel, Julie ;
Henley, M. Bradford ;
Barei, David P. ;
Taitsman, Lisa A. ;
Nork, Sean E. .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2009, 40 (11) :1180-1186
[3]   Influence of treatment modality on morbidity and mortality in periprosthetic femoral fracture. A comparative study of 71 fractures treated by internal fixation or femoral implant revision [J].
Cohen, S. ;
Flecher, X. ;
Parratte, S. ;
Ollivier, M. ;
Argenson, J. -N. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2018, 104 (03) :363-367
[4]  
Duncan CP, 1995, AAOS INSTR COURS LEC, V44, P293
[5]   Hip Revision Arthroplasty in Periprosthetic Fractures of Vancouver Type B2 and B3 [J].
Fink, Bernd ;
Grossmann, Alexandra ;
Singer, Joachim .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2012, 26 (04) :206-211
[6]   Outcomes and predictors of mortality following periprosthethic proximal femoral fractures [J].
Finlayson, Graham ;
Tucker, Adam ;
Black, Nicholas D. ;
McDonald, Sinead ;
Molloy, Mary ;
Wilson, Darrin .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2019, 50 (02) :438-443
[7]   Periprosthetic femoral fractures - a comparison between cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasties [J].
Foster, AP ;
Thompson, NW ;
Wong, J ;
Charlwood, AP .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2005, 36 (03) :424-429
[8]   Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fracture [J].
Franklin, John ;
Malchau, Henrik .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2007, 38 (06) :655-660
[9]  
Kelley, 1994, J Am Acad Orthop Surg, V2, P164
[10]   Proximal femoral replacement for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures [J].
Klein, GR ;
Parvizi, J ;
Rapuri, V ;
Wolf, CF ;
Hozack, WJ ;
Sharkey, PF ;
Purtill, JJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (08) :1777-1781