Prognostic Significance of Neoadjuvant Rectal Scores in Preoperative Short-Course Radiotherapy and Long-Course Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

被引:8
作者
Huang, Wen-Shih [1 ]
Kuan, Feng-Che [2 ,3 ]
Lin, Meng-Hung [4 ]
Chen, Miao-Fen [3 ,5 ,6 ]
Chen, Wen-Cheng [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Colon & Rectal Surg, Chiayi, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Hematol & Oncol, Chiayi, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Univ, Grad Inst Clin Med Sci, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Hlth Informat & Epidemiol Lab, Chiayi, Taiwan
[5] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chiayi, Hsien, Taiwan
[6] Chang Gung Univ, Sch Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
关键词
TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; POSTOPERATIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; NAR SCORE; FOLLOW-UP; SURVIVAL; RECURRENCE; SURGERY; MULTICENTER; CHEMORADIATION;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-020-09018-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background This study aimed to investigate the prognostic factors and the utility of the neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score for patients who have locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treated with preoperative short-course radiotherapy (SRT) or long-course concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Methods Of 314 consecutive stage 2 or 3 rectal cancer patients enrolled from January 2006 to December 2017, 205 underwent preoperative SRT (2500 cGy/5 fractions), and 109 underwent preoperative CRT (4200-5080 cGy/21-28 fractions) after total mesorectal excision (TME). The study calculated NAR scores using the following equation: [5 pN - 3(cT - pT) + 12](2)/9.61. Results The multivariate analysis showed that age above 65 years, pT4, pN2, NAR scores higher than 16, and distance from anal verges (< 8 cm) were significant prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), whereas, pN2, NAR scores lower than 16, and distance from anal verges (< 8 cm) were significant prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS) and distant metastasis (DM). The patients with an NAR score higher than 16, had a 5-year OS rate of 67.6%, a DFS rate of 56.9%, a locoregional recurrence (LRR) rate of 7.7%, and a DM rate of 35% compared with corresponding rates of 87.6%, 76.7%, 5.4%, and 7.2% for the patients with an NAR score of 16 or lower (p < 0.001 for OS, < 0.001 for DFS, 0.25 for LRR, and < 0.001 for DM). Conclusions For patients who undergo SRT or CRT for LARC, a higher NAR score is associated with worse OS and DFS and higher DM rates at 5 years. The NAR score could be used as a short-term surrogate end point after neoadjuvant therapy for LARC.
引用
收藏
页码:4309 / 4318
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing preoperative short-course radiotherapy with preoperative conventionally fractionated chemoradiation for rectal cancer [J].
Bujko, K. ;
Nowacki, M. P. ;
Nasierowska-Guttmejer, A. ;
Michalski, W. ;
Bebenek, M. ;
Kryj, M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 93 (10) :1215-1223
[2]   Preoperative radiotherapy for rectal adenocarcinoma: Which are strong prognostic factors? [J].
Chapet, O ;
Romestaing, P ;
Mornex, F ;
Souquet, JC ;
Favrel, V ;
Ardiet, JM ;
D'Hombres, A ;
Gerard, JP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (05) :1371-1377
[3]   Prognostic Value of Clinical vs Pathologic Stage in Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Therapy [J].
Delitto, Daniel ;
George, Thomas J., Jr. ;
Loftus, Tyler J. ;
Qiu, Peihua ;
Chang, George J. ;
Allegra, Carmen J. ;
Hall, William A. ;
Hughes, Steven J. ;
Tan, Sanda A. ;
Shaw, Christiana M. ;
Iqbal, Atif .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2018, 110 (05) :460-466
[4]   Optimal fractionation of preoperative radiotherapy and timing to surgery for rectal cancer (Stockholm III): a multicentre, randomised, non-blinded, phase 3, non-inferiority trial [J].
Erlandsson, Johan ;
Holm, Torbjorn ;
Pettersson, David ;
Berglund, Ake ;
Cedermark, Bjorn ;
Radu, Calin ;
Johansson, Hemming ;
Machado, Mikael ;
Hjern, Fredrik ;
Hallbook, Olof ;
Syk, Ingvar ;
Glimelius, Bengt ;
Martling, Anna .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2017, 18 (03) :336-346
[5]   Neoadjuvant rectal score as individual-level surrogate for disease-free survival in rectal cancer in the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomized phase III trial [J].
Fokas, E. ;
Fietkau, R. ;
Hartmann, A. ;
Hohenberger, W. ;
Gruetzmann, R. ;
Ghadimi, M. ;
Liersch, T. ;
Stroebel, P. ;
Grabenbauer, G. G. ;
Graeven, U. ;
Hofheinz, R-D ;
Koehne, C-H ;
Wittekind, C. ;
Sauer, R. ;
Kaufmann, M. ;
Hothorn, T. ;
Roedel, C. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29 (07) :1521-1527
[6]   Swedish rectal cancer trial: Long lasting benefits from radiotherapy on survival and local recurrence rate [J].
Folkesson, J ;
Birgisson, H ;
Pahlman, L ;
Cedermark, B ;
Glimelius, B ;
Gunnarsson, U .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (24) :5644-5650
[7]   Total Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Shifting Paradigm in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Management [J].
Franke, Aaron J. ;
Parekh, Hiral ;
Starr, Jason S. ;
Tan, Sanda A. ;
Iqbal, Atif ;
George, Thomas J., Jr. .
CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2018, 17 (01) :1-12
[8]   Neoadjuvant Rectal (NAR) Score: a New Surrogate Endpoint in Rectal Cancer Clinical Trials [J].
George, Thomas J., Jr. ;
Allegra, Carmen J. ;
Yothers, Greg .
CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS, 2015, 11 (05) :275-280
[9]   Validation of the NSABP neoadjuvant rectal score (NAR) in a prospective phase II study evaluating an experimental regimen and a standard chemoradiation cohort with molecular genotyping. [J].
Hong, Theodore S. ;
Szymonifka, Jackie ;
Yothers, Greg ;
Blaszkowsky, Lawrence Scott ;
Russo, Andrea Lyn ;
Wo, Jennifer Yon-Li ;
Mamon, Harvey J. ;
Kwak, Eunice Lee ;
Zhu, Andrew X. ;
Allen, Jill N. ;
Clark, Jeffrey W. ;
Ryan, David P. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (15)
[10]  
Hospers G, 2020, ASCO VIRTUAL SCI PRO