Benefit of clopidogrel according to timing of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes: Further results from the Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent Events (CURE) study

被引:56
|
作者
Lewis, BS [1 ]
Mehta, SR
Fox, KAA
Halon, DA
Zhao, F
Peters, RJG
Keltai, M
Budaj, A
Yusuf, S
机构
[1] Lady Davies Carmel Med Ctr, Dept Cardiovasc Med, IL-34362 Haifa, Israel
[2] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Ruth & Bruce Rappaport Sch Med, Haifa, Israel
[3] McMaster Univ, Canadian Cardiovasc Collaborat Project Off, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] Royal Infirm, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Semmelweis Univ, H-1085 Budapest, Hungary
[7] Hungarian Natl Inst Cardiol, Budapest, Hungary
[8] Grochowski Hosp, Postgrad Med Sch, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ahj.2005.01.044
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The CURE study demonstrated the benefit of clopidogrel in patients with non-ST elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndromes (ACSs), including those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It did not report the relation between clopidogrel and timing of PCI or, more specifically, the role of clopidogrel in patients managed with an early interventional strategy, the current preferred treatment option for patients with NSTE ACSs. In the present study, we examined the relation between clopidogrel therapy, timing of PCI, and cardiovascular (CV) events in patients participating in the CURE study. Methods A total of 12562 patients with NSTE ACSs was randomized in double-blind fashion to clopidogrel or placebo (300 mg loading dose, then 75 mg/d) in addition to aspirin for up to 1 year. We analyzed the data of the 2658 CURE patients undergoing PCI and related the incidence of outcome events (CV death/myocardial infarction [MI]) to timing of PCI after randomization: early (<48 hours, median 1.0 day, n = 370), intermediate (>= 48 hours to initial hospital discharge, median 6.8 days, n = 1360), and late (after initial hospital discharge, median 47.6 days, n = 928). Results Clopidogrel showed consistent treatment benefit over the 12-month (mean 9 months) follow-up period irrespective of timing of PCI (relative risk [RR] 0.53 for the early group, RR 0.72 for the intermediate group, RR 0.70 for the late group). After adjustment for propensity to undergo PCI, the greatest treatment benefit of clopidogrel was observed in patients undergoing PCI <48 hours after randomization (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.21-0.96, P =.038), although with overlap between groups. The lowest absolute event rate (6.7% CV death/MI) was observed in patients treated with clopidogrel and undergoing PCI within 48 hours. There was no increased risk of major bleeding in the early PCI group. Conclusions The benefit of therapy with clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients presenting with NSTE ACSs was significant irrespective of the timing of PCI. The combination of clopidogrel and an early (<48 hours) interventional strategy was associated with low absolute event rates for CV death/nonfatal MI.
引用
收藏
页码:1177 / 1184
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of prasugrel and clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
    Norgard, Nicholas B.
    Abu-Fadel, Mazen
    VASCULAR HEALTH AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2009, 5 : 873 - 882
  • [22] Prasugrel or Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes With Multivessel Disease: Results From the PROMETHEUS Study
    Chiarito, Mauro
    Pivato, Carlo Andrea
    Cao, Davide
    Zhang, Zhongjie
    Sartori, Samantha
    Nicolas, Johny
    Nardin, Matteo
    Kapadia, Samir
    Weiss, Sandra
    Rao, Sunil
    Henry, Timothy
    Effron, Mark
    Weintraub, William
    Pocock, Stuart
    Dangas, George
    Kini, Annapoorna
    Mehran, Roxana
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 78 (19) : B93 - B93
  • [24] Benefit of Clopidogrel for acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary interventions in doubt due to rebound adverse events
    Cundiff, David K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 102 (02): : 248 - 248
  • [25] Association of Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel With Major Adverse Coronary Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Turgeon, Ricky D.
    Koshman, Sheri L.
    Youngson, Erik
    Har, Bryan
    Wilton, Stephen B.
    James, Matthew T.
    Graham, Michelle M.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 180 (03) : 420 - 428
  • [26] A Comparative Study on Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Wu, Hui
    Jia, Shaobin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 63 (07): : 776 - 783
  • [27] Evaluation of prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes and planned percutaneous coronary intervention: The TRITON-TIMI 38 Study
    Antman, Elliott M.
    CIRCULATION, 2007, 116 (22) : 2628 - 2628
  • [28] Platelet proteome and clopidogrel response in patients with stable angina undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
    Volpi, Elisabetta
    Giusti, Laura
    Ciregia, Federica
    Da Valle, Ylenia
    Giannaccini, Gino
    Berti, Sergio
    Clerico, Aldo
    Lucacchini, Antonio
    CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2012, 45 (10-11) : 758 - 765
  • [29] Omeprazole affects clopidogrel efficacy but not ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention
    REN Yi-hong
    ZHAO Ming
    CHEN Yun-dai
    CHEN Lian
    LIU Hong-bin
    WANG Yu
    SUN Zhi-jun
    CHEN Jin-song
    HUANG Ting-ting
    GUO Yu-song
    XIE Yong-jin
    WANG Chun-ya
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2011, (06) : 856 - 861
  • [30] Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes. Results of the PLATO Study
    Preobrazhensky, D. V.
    KARDIOLOGIYA, 2010, 50 (01) : 68 - 68