Prognostic Value of Aortic Valve Area by Doppler Echocardiography in Patients With Severe Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis

被引:23
作者
Marechaux, Sylvestre [1 ,3 ]
Ringle, Anne [1 ]
Rusinaru, Dan [2 ]
Debry, Nicolas [1 ]
Bohbot, Yoan [2 ]
Tribouilloy, Christophe [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lille Nord France, Fac Med, Inst Catholique Lille, Grp Hop, Lille, France
[2] Univ Hosp Amiens, Dept Cardiol, Ave Rene Laennec, F-80054 Amiens 1, France
[3] Jules Verne Univ Picardie, INSERM, U1088, Amiens, France
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | 2016年 / 5卷 / 05期
关键词
aortic stenosis; Doppler echocardiography; outcome; surgery; EXERCISE-STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; VALVULOARTERIAL IMPEDANCE; NATURAL-HISTORY; LOW-GRADIENT; RECOMMENDATIONS; REPLACEMENT; MANAGEMENT; STRATIFICATION; PREDICTORS; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1161/JAHA.115.003146
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between aortic valve area (AVA) obtained by Doppler echocardiography and outcome in patients with severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis and to define a specific threshold of AVA for identifying asymptomatic patients at very high risk based on their clinical outcome. Methods and Results-We included 199 patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AVA <= 1.0 cm(2)). The risk of events (death or need for aortic valve replacement) increased linearly on the scale of log hazard with decreased AVA (adjusted hazard ratio 1.17; 95% CI 1.06-1.29 per 0.1 cm(2) AVA decrement; P=0.002). Event-free survival at 12, 24, and 48 months was 63 +/- 6%, 51 +/- 6%, and 34 +/- 6%, respectively, for AVA 0.8 to 1 cm(2); 49 +/- 6%, 36 +/- 6%, and 26 +/- Z6%, respectively, for AVA 0.6 to 0.8 cm(2); and 33 +/- 8%, 20 +/- 7%, and 11 +/- 5%, respectively, for AVA <= 0.6 cm(2) (P-trend=0.002). Patients with AVA <= 0.6 cm(2) had a significantly increased risk of events compared with patients with AVA 0.8 to 1 cm(2) (adjusted hazard ratio 2.22; 95% CI 1.41-3.52; P=0.001), whereas patients with AVA 0.6 to 0.8 cm(2) had an increased risk of events compared with those with AVA 0.8 to 1 cm(2), but the difference was not statistically significant (adjusted hazard ratio 1.38; 95% CI 0.93-2.05; P=0.11). After adjustment for covariates and aortic valve replacement as a time-dependent variable, patients with AVA <= 0.6 cm(2) had a significantly greater risk of all-cause mortality than patients with AVA >0.6 cm(2) (hazard ratio 3.39; 95% CI 1.80-6.40; P<0.0001). Conclusions-Patients with severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis and AVA <= 0.6 cm(2) displayed an important increase in the risk of adverse events during short-term follow-up. Further studies are needed to determine whether elective aortic valve replacement improves outcome in this high-risk subgroup of patients.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EUR HEART J
[2]   Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice [J].
Baumgartner, Helmut ;
Hung, Judy ;
Bermejo, Javier ;
Chambers, John B. ;
Evangelista, Arturo ;
Griffin, Brian P. ;
Iung, Bernard ;
Otto, Catherine M. ;
Pellikka, Patricia A. ;
Quinones, Miguel .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2009, 10 (01) :1-25
[3]   ON THE NATURAL-HISTORY OF SEVERE AORTIC-STENOSIS [J].
BRAUNWALD, E .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1990, 15 (05) :1018-1020
[4]   Relationship between Cutoff Values of Peak Aortic Valve Velocity and Those of Other Doppler Echocardiographic Parameters of Severity in Patients with Aortic Stenosis and Normal Flow [J].
Castel, Anne-Laure ;
Marechaux, Sylvestre ;
Laaouaj, Jamal ;
Rusinaru, Dan ;
Levy, Franck ;
Tribouilloy, Christophe .
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES, 2012, 29 (10) :1150-1156
[5]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[6]   CONTINUOUS-WAVE DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF SEVERITY OF CALCIFIC AORTIC-STENOSIS - A SIMULTANEOUS DOPPLER-CATHETER CORRELATIVE STUDY IN 100 ADULT PATIENTS [J].
CURRIE, PJ ;
SEWARD, JB ;
REEDER, GS ;
VLIETSTRA, RE ;
BRESNAHAN, DR ;
BRESNAHAN, JF ;
SMITH, HC ;
HAGLER, DJ ;
TAJIK, AJ .
CIRCULATION, 1985, 71 (06) :1162-1169
[7]   Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment [J].
Dumesnil, Jean G. ;
Pibarot, Philippe ;
Carabello, Blase .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (03) :281-289
[8]  
ELAYDA MA, 1993, CIRCULATION, V88, P11
[9]   Exercise testing and exercise stress echocardiography in asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis [J].
Ennezat, P. V. ;
Marechaux, S. ;
Iung, B. ;
Chauvel, C. ;
LeJemtel, T. H. ;
Pibarot, P. .
HEART, 2009, 95 (11) :877-884
[10]   Usefulness of the Valvuloarterial Impedance to Predict Adverse Outcome in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis [J].
Hachicha, Zeineb ;
Dumesnil, Jean G. ;
Pibarot, Philippe .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (11) :1003-1011