Untangling the positive genetic correlation between rainbow trout growth and survival

被引:36
作者
Vehvilainen, Harri [1 ]
Kause, Antti [1 ]
Kuukka-Anttila, Hanna [2 ,3 ]
Koskinen, Heikki [4 ]
Paananen, Tuija [4 ]
机构
[1] MTT Agrifood Res Finland, Jokioinen, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Biosci, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Finnish Game & Fisheries Res Inst, Helsinki, Finland
[4] Finnish Game & Fisheries Res Inst, Tervo, Finland
关键词
animal breeding; aquaculture; body size; evolutionary theory; fitness cost; life-history trade-off; Oncorhynchus mykiss; quantitative genetics; BODY-SIZE; LIFE-HISTORY; QUANTITATIVE GENETICS; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; BREEDING PROGRAM; DEVELOPMENT TIME; FEED-EFFICIENCY; SELECTION; EVOLUTION; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1752-4571.2012.00251.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Explanations for positive and negative genetic correlations between growth and fitness traits are essential for life-history theory and selective breeding. Here, we test whether growth and survival display genetic trade-off. Furthermore, we assess the potential of third-party traits to explain observed genetic associations. First, we estimated genetic correlations of growth and survival of rainbow trout. We then explored whether these associations are explained by genetic correlations with health, body composition and maturity traits. Analysis included 14 traits across life stages and environments. Data were recorded from 249 166 individuals belonging to 10 year classes of a pedigreed population. The results revealed that rapid growth during grow-out was genetically associated with enhanced survival (mean r(G) = 0.17). This resulted because genotypes with less nematode caused cataract grew faster and were more likely to survive. Fingerling survival was not genetically related to weight or to grow-out survival. Instead, rapid fingerling growth made fish prone to deformations (r(G) = 0.18). Evolutionary genetics provides a theoretical framework to study variation in genetic correlations. This study demonstrates that genetic correlation patterns of growth and survival can be explained by a set of key explanatory traits recorded at different life stages and that these traits can be simultaneously improved by selective breeding.
引用
收藏
页码:732 / 745
页数:14
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, The genetical theory of natural selection: a complete variorum edition
[2]   The evolution of body size: What keeps organisms small? [J].
Blanckenhorn, WU .
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 2000, 75 (04) :385-407
[3]   Carotenolds and life-history evolution in animals [J].
Blount, JD .
ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS, 2004, 430 (01) :10-15
[4]   Evo-devo and constraints on selection [J].
Brakefield, Paul M. .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2006, 21 (07) :362-368
[5]   A review of quantitative genetic components of fitness in salmonids: implications for adaptation to future change [J].
Carlson, Stephanie M. ;
Seamons, Todd R. .
EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS, 2008, 1 (02) :222-238
[6]  
CHARLESWORTH B, 1990, EVOLUTION, V44, P520, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05936.x
[7]  
de Greef KH, 2001, J ANIM SCI, V79, P1723
[8]   Selection and phenotypic plasticity in evolutionary biology and animal breeding [J].
de Jong, G ;
Bijma, P .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2002, 78 (03) :195-214
[9]   The evolution of growth trajectories: what limits growth rate? [J].
Dmitriew, Caitlin M. .
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2011, 86 (01) :97-116
[10]   Just How Much is the G-matrix Actually Constraining Adaptation? [J].
Eroukhmanoff, Fabrice .
EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2009, 36 (03) :323-326