Variability of shallow soil amplification from surface-wave inversion using the Markov-chain Monte Carlo method

被引:12
|
作者
Saifuddin [1 ]
Yamanaka, Hiroaki [1 ]
Chimoto, Kosuke [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Inst Technol, Dept Environm Sci & Technol, Midori Ku, 4259-G5-6 Nagatsuta, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2268502, Japan
关键词
Variability; S-wave velocity profiles; Markov-chain Monte Carlo method; Nonlinear soil amplification; UNCERTAINTY; VELOCITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.014
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
We conduct numerical experiments to estimate the variability of 1D linear and nonlinear soil amplifications due to the uncertainty in shallow S-wave velocity profiles derived from surface-wave phase velocity inversions using the Markov-chain Monte Carlo method. We first generate synthetic, observed phase velocities of Rayleigh waves for two- and three-layer models of shallow soil. Our final models from sampling can explain well the true S-wave velocity profiles and the phase velocities. We also estimate the uncertainties of each model parameter. A synthetic strong motion is applied to the engineering bedrock of the sampled models to obtain the surface motion assuming linear and nonlinear amplifications. It is found that the nonlinear amplification shows less variability and also has a flatter spectral shape than the linear amplification, particularly at high frequencies. The distributions of ground motion proxies generally have less uncertainty for the nonlinear amplification as well. We also find that the observational errors of the phase velocities have less influence on the variability of the nonlinear amplification than the linear case. This result is caused by the high damping factor applied in the nonlinear soil response.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 151
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Basis-constrained Bayesian Markov-chain Monte Carlo difference inversion for geoelectrical monitoring of hydrogeologic processes
    Oware, Erasmus Kofi
    Irving, James
    Hermans, Thomas
    GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 84 (04) : A37 - A42
  • [32] Decoding Fingerprints Using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method
    Furon, Teddy
    Guyader, Arnaud
    Cerou, Frederic
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON INFORMATION FORENSICS AND SECURITY (WIFS), 2012, : 187 - 192
  • [33] Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling using a reservoir method
    Wang, Zhonglei
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2019, 139 : 64 - 74
  • [34] Prosumer Response Estimation Using SINDyc in Conjunction with Markov-Chain Monte-Carlo Sampling
    Banis, Frederik
    Madsen, Henrik
    Poulsen, Niels K.
    Guericke, Daniela
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (12)
  • [35] Electric Vehicle Velocity and Energy Consumption Predictions Using Transformer and Markov-Chain Monte Carlo
    Shen, Heran
    Wang, Zejiang
    Zhou, Xingyu
    Lamantia, Maxavier
    Yang, Kuo
    Chen, Pingen
    Wang, Junmin
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION, 2022, 8 (03) : 3836 - 3847
  • [36] Geostatistical approach to bayesian inversion of geophysical data: Markov chain Monte Carlo method
    Seok-Hoon Oh
    Byung-Doo Kwon
    Earth, Planets and Space, 2001, 53 : 777 - 791
  • [37] Geostatistical approach to bayesian inversion of geophysical data: Markov chain Monte Carlo method
    Oh, SH
    Kwon, BD
    EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE, 2001, 53 (08): : 777 - 791
  • [38] The Convergence of Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods: From the Metropolis Method to Hamiltonian Monte Carlo
    Betancourt, Michael
    ANNALEN DER PHYSIK, 2019, 531 (03)
  • [39] Stochastic inversion of electrical resistivity changes using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach
    Ramirez, AL
    Nitao, JJ
    Hanley, WG
    Aines, R
    Glaser, RE
    Sengupta, SK
    Dyer, KM
    Hickling, TL
    Daily, WD
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2005, 110 (B2) : 1 - 18
  • [40] Deconvolution and credible intervals using Markov chain Monte Carlo method
    Hovorka, R
    MEDICAL DATA ANALYSIS, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 1933 : 111 - 121