Blood-based and urinary prostate cancer biomarkers: a review and comparison of novel biomarkers for detection and treatment decisions

被引:101
作者
Hendriks, R. J. [1 ]
van Oort, I. M. [1 ]
Schalken, J. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Postbus 9101, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
HEALTH INDEX PHI; ANTIGEN; 3; PCA3; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; FUSION TRANSCRIPTS; UNNECESSARY BIOPSY; GENE FUSION; DIAGNOSIS; IMPROVE; MEN; SERUM;
D O I
10.1038/pcan.2016.59
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) is currently based on serum PSA testing and/or abnormal digital rectal examination and histopathologic evaluation of prostate biopsies. The main drawback of PSA testing is the lack of specificity for PCa. To improve early detection of PCa more specific biomarkers are needed. In the past few years, many new promising biomarkers have been identified; however, to date, only a few have reached clinical practice. METHODS: In this review, we discuss new blood-based and urinary biomarker models that are promising for usage in PCa detection, follow-up and treatment decision-making. These include Prostate Health Index (PHI), prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3), four-kallikrein panel (4K), transmembrane protease serine 2-ERG (TMPRSS2-ERG), ExoDx Prostate Intelliscore, SelectMDx and the Mi-Prostate score. Only few head-to-head studies are available for these new fluid-based biomarkers and/or models. The blood-based PHI and urinary PCA3 are two US Food and Drug Administration-approved biomarkers for diagnosis of PCa. In the second part of this review, we give an overview of published studies comparing these two available biomarkers for prediction of (1) PCa upon prostate biopsy, (2) pathological features in radical prostatectomy specimen and (3) significant PCa in patients eligible for active surveillance. RESULTS: Studies show opposing results in comparison of PHI with PCA3 for prediction of PCa upon initial and repeat prostate biopsy. PHI and PCA3 are able to predict pathological findings on radical prostatectomy specimen, such as tumor volume and Gleason score. Only PHI could predict seminal vesicle invasion and only PCA3 could predict multifocality. There is some evidence that PHI outperforms PCA3 in predicting significant PCa in an active surveillance population. CONCLUSIONS: Future research should focus on independent validation of promising fluid-based biomarkers/models, and prospective comparison of biomarkers with each other.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 19
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Urinary Biomarkers for the Detection of Prostate Cancer in Patients With High-Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia
    Sequeiros, Tamara
    Bastaros, Juan M.
    Sanchez, Milagros
    Rigau, Marina
    Montes, Melania
    Placer, Jose
    Planas, Jaques
    de Torres, Ines
    Reventos, Jaume
    Pegtel, D. Michiel
    Doll, Andreas
    Morote, Juan
    Olivan, Mireia
    [J]. PROSTATE, 2015, 75 (10) : 1102 - 1113
  • [42] Advancements in Biomarkers of Prostate Cancer: A Review
    Agbetuyi-Tayo, Praise
    Gbadebo, Mary
    Rotimi, Oluwakemi A.
    Rotimi, Solomon O.
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2024, 23
  • [43] Blood-based molecular biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease
    Zetterberg, Henrik
    Burnham, Samantha C.
    [J]. MOLECULAR BRAIN, 2019, 12 (1)
  • [44] New Biomarkers in Serum and Urine for Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Stephan, C.
    Jung, K.
    Miller, K.
    Ralla, B.
    [J]. AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2015, 46 (02) : 129 - 143
  • [45] Blood-based biomarkers for early detection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Ling-Yu Chu
    Yu-Hui Peng
    Xue-Fen Weng
    Jian-Jun Xie
    Yi-Wei Xu
    [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2020, 26 (15) : 1708 - 1725
  • [46] Blood-based biomarkers for early detection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Chu, Ling-Yu
    Peng, Yu-Hui
    Weng, Xue-Fen
    Xie, Jian-Jun
    Xu, Yi-Wei
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 26 (15) : 1708 - 1725
  • [47] Blood-Based Biomarkers in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Narrative Review With Implications for the Legal System
    McBride, William R.
    Eltman, Nicholas R.
    Swanson, Randel L.
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (06)
  • [48] Beyond blood biomarkers: the role of SelectMDX in clinically significant prostate cancer identification
    Ferro, Matteo
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Maggi, Martina
    Lucarelli, Giuseppe
    Falagario, Ugo Giovanni
    Del Giudice, Francesco
    Crocetto, Felice
    Barone, Biagio
    La Civita, Evelina
    Lasorsa, Francesco
    Brescia, Antonio
    Catellani, Michele
    Busetto, Gian Maria
    Tataru, Octavian Sabin
    Terracciano, Daniela
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 23 (12) : 1061 - 1070
  • [49] Blood-based protein biomarkers during the acute ischemic stroke treatment window: a systematic review
    Rahmig, Jan
    Chanpura, Aditya
    Schultz, Aaliyah
    Barone, Frank C.
    Gustafson, Deborah
    Baird, Alison E.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [50] Diagnostic Accuracy of Blood-based Biomarkers for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Kane, Laura E.
    Mellotte, Gregory S.
    Mylod, Eimear
    O'Brien, Rebecca M.
    O'Connell, Fiona
    Buckley, Croi E.
    Arlow, Jennifer
    Nguyen, Khanh
    Mockler, David
    Meade, Aidan D.
    Ryan, Barbara M.
    Maher, Stephen G.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 2 (10): : 1229 - 1243