Blood-based and urinary prostate cancer biomarkers: a review and comparison of novel biomarkers for detection and treatment decisions

被引:101
作者
Hendriks, R. J. [1 ]
van Oort, I. M. [1 ]
Schalken, J. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Postbus 9101, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
HEALTH INDEX PHI; ANTIGEN; 3; PCA3; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; FUSION TRANSCRIPTS; UNNECESSARY BIOPSY; GENE FUSION; DIAGNOSIS; IMPROVE; MEN; SERUM;
D O I
10.1038/pcan.2016.59
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) is currently based on serum PSA testing and/or abnormal digital rectal examination and histopathologic evaluation of prostate biopsies. The main drawback of PSA testing is the lack of specificity for PCa. To improve early detection of PCa more specific biomarkers are needed. In the past few years, many new promising biomarkers have been identified; however, to date, only a few have reached clinical practice. METHODS: In this review, we discuss new blood-based and urinary biomarker models that are promising for usage in PCa detection, follow-up and treatment decision-making. These include Prostate Health Index (PHI), prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3), four-kallikrein panel (4K), transmembrane protease serine 2-ERG (TMPRSS2-ERG), ExoDx Prostate Intelliscore, SelectMDx and the Mi-Prostate score. Only few head-to-head studies are available for these new fluid-based biomarkers and/or models. The blood-based PHI and urinary PCA3 are two US Food and Drug Administration-approved biomarkers for diagnosis of PCa. In the second part of this review, we give an overview of published studies comparing these two available biomarkers for prediction of (1) PCa upon prostate biopsy, (2) pathological features in radical prostatectomy specimen and (3) significant PCa in patients eligible for active surveillance. RESULTS: Studies show opposing results in comparison of PHI with PCA3 for prediction of PCa upon initial and repeat prostate biopsy. PHI and PCA3 are able to predict pathological findings on radical prostatectomy specimen, such as tumor volume and Gleason score. Only PHI could predict seminal vesicle invasion and only PCA3 could predict multifocality. There is some evidence that PHI outperforms PCA3 in predicting significant PCa in an active surveillance population. CONCLUSIONS: Future research should focus on independent validation of promising fluid-based biomarkers/models, and prospective comparison of biomarkers with each other.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 19
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Urinary biomarkers for the detection of ovarian cancer: a systematic review
    Owens, Gemma L.
    Barr, Chloe E.
    White, Holly
    Njoku, Kelechi
    Crosbie, Emma J.
    CARCINOGENESIS, 2022, 43 (04) : 311 - 320
  • [22] Clinical utility of current biomarkers for prostate cancer detection
    Kim, Jeong Hyun
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2021, 62 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [23] Urinary biomarkers in prostate cancer: An update
    Durand, X.
    Xylinas, E.
    Ploussard, G.
    De la Taille, A.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2010, 20 (13): : 1184 - 1191
  • [24] Comparative Study of Blood-Based Biomarkers, α2,3-Sialic Acid PSA and PHI, for High-Risk Prostate Cancer Detection
    Ferrer-Batalle, Montserrat
    Llop, Esther
    Ramirez, Manel
    Nuria Aleixandre, Rosa
    Saez, Marc
    Comet, Josep
    de Llorens, Rafael
    Peracaula, Rosa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2017, 18 (04):
  • [25] Blood-based protein biomarkers and red blood cell aggregation in pancreatic cancer
    Wiewiora, Maciej
    Jopek, Janusz
    Swietochowska, Elzbieta
    Slawomir, Gregorczyn
    Piecuch, Jerzy, Jr.
    Gaska, Mateusz
    Piecuch, Jerzy
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2023, 85 (04) : 371 - 383
  • [26] Urinary fatty acid biomarkers for prostate cancer detection
    Landa, Elizabeth Noriega
    Quaye, George E.
    Su, Xiaogang
    Badmos, Sabur
    Holbrook, Kiana L.
    Polascik, Thomas J.
    Adams, Eric S.
    Deivasigamani, Sriram
    Gao, Qin
    Annabi, Michael H.
    Habib, Ahsan
    Lee, Wen-Yee
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (02):
  • [27] Novel Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer Detection and Prognosis
    Filella, Xavier
    Foj, Laura
    CELL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF PROSTATE CANCER: UPDATES, INSIGHTS AND NEW FRONTIERS, 2018, 1095 : 15 - 39
  • [28] Urinary Polyamines: A Pilot Study on Their Roles as Prostate Cancer Detection Biomarkers
    Tsoi, Tik-Hung
    Chan, Chi-Fai
    Chan, Wai-Lun
    Chiu, Ka-Fung
    Wong, Wing-Tak
    Ng, Chi-Fai
    Wong, Ka-Leung
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (09):
  • [29] Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers of Prostate Cancer: An Update
    Anceschi, Umberto
    Tuderti, Gabriele
    Lugnani, Franco
    Biava, Pier Mario
    Malossini, Gianni
    Luciani, Lorenzo
    Cai, Tommaso
    Marsiliani, Davide
    Filianoti, Alessio
    Mattevi, Daniele
    Costantini, Manuela
    Misuraca, Leonardo
    Simone, Giuseppe
    CURRENT MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2019, 26 (06) : 1045 - 1058
  • [30] Review of novel liquid-based biomarkers for prostate cancer: towards personalised and targeted medicine
    Osei, Ernest
    Swanson, Stephanie
    Francis, Ruth
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2021, 22