Metaphors for Learning & MOOC Pedagogies

被引:8
作者
Swan, Karen [1 ]
Day, Scott [1 ]
Bogle, Leonard [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, One Univ Plaza,MS BRK 377, Springfield, IL 62703 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD (2016) ACM CONFERENCE ON LEARNING @ SCALE (L@S 2016) | 2016年
关键词
MOOCs; Pedagogy; Metaphors for Learning;
D O I
10.1145/2876034.2893385
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The research reported in this paper used a researcher developed tool to categorize the pedagogical approaches used in MOOCs. The Assessing MOOC Pedagogies (AMP) tool characterized MOOC pedagogical approaches on ten dimensions. Preliminary testing on 20 different MOOCs demonstrated >= 80% inter reliability and the facility of the measure to distinguish differing pedagogical patterns. The patterns distinguished crossed content areas and seemed to be related to what Sfard (1998) identified as metaphors for learning; acquisition and participation approaches seemed to distinguish the pedagogies of differing MOOCs. A third, arguably important, pattern related to self direction was also distinguished.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 128
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MOOCS OPEN ED WORLD
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Moral Leadership: Getting to the heart of school leadership, DOI 10.3102/0013189X027002004
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, The New York Times July 20
[4]  
[Anonymous], COMMUNICATIONS ACM
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, MOOC PHENOMENON WHO
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2012, MIT TECHNOLOGY REV
[7]   MOOCs Need More Work; So Do CS Graduates [J].
Guzdial, Mark ;
Adams, Joel C. .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2014, 57 (01) :18-19
[8]  
Markoff J., 2011, NY TIMES
[9]  
Pappano L., 2012, The New York Times
[10]  
Reeves T, 1996, EVALUATING WHAT REAL