Children's mental representation when comparing fractions with common numerators

被引:8
作者
Liu, Chunhui [1 ]
Xin, Ziqiang [2 ]
Lin, Chongde [1 ]
Thompson, Clarissa A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Inst Dev Psychol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Social Dev, Dept Psychol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Oklahoma, Dept Psychol, Norman, OK 73019 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
fraction; mental number line; representation; componential strategy; WHOLE NUMBER; MAGNITUDE; PARITY; MEMORY; SPEED; SIZE;
D O I
10.1080/01443410.2012.730324
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Researchers debate whether one represents the magnitude of a fraction according to its real numerical value or just the discrete numerosity of its numerator or denominator. The present study examined three effects based on the notion that people possess a mental number line to explore how children represent fractions when they compare fractions with common numerators. Specifically, the effect of the spatial numerical association of response codes (SNARC), the distance effect and the size effect in representing fractions were examined in a sample of 72 sixth graders, who successfully solved the fraction comparison task with a real number (.2) or a fraction (1/5) as the reference. Results showed that in the fraction-reference group (1/5 as the reference), there was a significant reverse SNARC effect and a distance effect between the denominators of the target fractions and the reference fraction; in the real number-reference group, the three effects were also observed. These results revealed that both groups used the mental number line to represent fractions and did not represent their real numerical values but rather the discrete numerosities of denominators when comparing fractions with common numerators. It seems that the way people represent fractions may depend on their strategy choices.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 191
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mental representation of fractions: It all depends on whether they are common or uncommon
    Liu, Fuchang
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 71 (09) : 1873 - 1886
  • [2] Common magnitude representation of fractions and decimals is task dependent
    Zhang, Li
    Fang, Qiaochu
    Gabriel, Florence C.
    Szucs, Denes
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 69 (04) : 764 - 780
  • [3] Developing Children's Understanding of Fractions: An Intervention Study
    Gabriel, Florence
    Coche, Frederic
    Szucs, Denes
    Carette, Vincent
    Rey, Bernard
    Content, Alain
    MIND BRAIN AND EDUCATION, 2012, 6 (03) : 137 - 146
  • [4] Unbounding the mental number line-new evidence on children's spatial representation of numbers
    Link, Tanja
    Huber, Stefan
    Nuerk, Hans-Christoph
    Moeller, Korbinian
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 4
  • [5] Symbolic fractions elicit an analog magnitude representation in school-age children
    Kalra, Priya B.
    Binzak, John, V
    Matthews, Percival G.
    Hubbard, Edward M.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 195
  • [6] A componential view of children's difficulties in learning fractions
    Gabriel, Florence
    Coche, Frederic
    Szucs, Denes
    Carette, Vincent
    Rey, Bernard
    Content, Alain
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 4
  • [7] The influence of instructional intervention on children's understanding of fractions
    Yoshida, H
    Shinmachi, Y
    JAPANESE PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 41 (04) : 218 - 228
  • [8] Body weight representation in children's picturebooks
    Farago, Flora
    Savoy, Sarah
    Xu, Tingting
    He, Yuan
    CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN EARLY CHILDHOOD, 2023,
  • [9] Children's Representation of Child and Adult Knowledge
    Fitneva, Stanka A.
    JOURNAL OF COGNITION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 11 (04) : 458 - 484
  • [10] Magnitude-based reasoning can reduce the natural number bias when comparing fractions: An intervention study
    D'Erchie, Michael
    Rosenkranz, Johannes
    Schwarzmeier, Sabrina
    Dresler, Thomas
    Obersteiner, Andreas
    LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2025, 98