Measurement properties of a self-report index of ergonomic exposures for use in an office work environment

被引:44
作者
Dane, D
Feuerstein, M
Huang, GD
Dimberg, L
Ali, D
Lincoln, A
机构
[1] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Med & Clin Psychol, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[2] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Prevent Med & Biometr, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[3] Georgetown Univ, Div Behav Med, Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Washington, DC USA
[4] World Bank, Dept Hlth Serv, Washington, DC 20433 USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00043764-200201000-00012
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Office work-related upper extremity symptoms and disorders have been associated with static work posture, repetition, and inadequate recovery in the anatomic structures of the neck and upper extremities. Despite these associations, relatively little research has been conducted on the development of practical measures of these ergonomic exposures. The present study examines the measurement properties of an upper-extremity-specific self-report index of ergonomic exposures. Ninety-two symptomatic office workers completed a Web-based questionnaire measuring demographic variables, ergonomic exposures, pain, job stress, and functional limitations. Comparisons of internal consistency, construct validity, and discriminative and predictive abilities were made between the self-report index and an observational exposure assessment checklist. Results indicated that the self-report index had acceptable measurement properties. Furthermore, higher levels of self-reported ergonomic exposures were associated with upper extremity pain, symptom severity, and functional limitations. In constrast, higher levels of observed exposure were related only to the lower levels of general physical function. The self-report measure has potential for use in occupational health surveillance programs for work environments and as an outcome measure of ergonomic exposure in intervention trials. These results also suggest the need for using multiple methods when assessing ergonomic exposures.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 81
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   A CONCEPTUAL-MODEL FOR WORK-RELATED NECK AND UPPER-LIMB MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS [J].
ARMSTRONG, TJ ;
BUCKLE, P ;
FINE, LJ ;
HAGBERG, M ;
JONSSON, B ;
KILBOM, A ;
KUORINKA, IAA ;
SILVERSTEIN, BA ;
SJOGAARD, G ;
VIIKARIJUNTURA, ERA .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 1993, 19 (02) :73-84
[2]  
Baron S, 1996, AM J IND MED, V29, P609
[3]   JOB TASK AND PSYCHOSOCIAL RISK-FACTORS FOR WORK-RELATED MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS AMONG NEWSPAPER EMPLOYEES [J].
BERNARD, B ;
SAUTER, S ;
FINE, L ;
PETERSEN, M ;
HALES, T .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 1994, 20 (06) :417-426
[4]   PSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS AT WORK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE [J].
BONGERS, PM ;
DEWINTER, CR ;
KOMPIER, MAJ ;
HILDEBRANDT, VH .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 1993, 19 (05) :297-312
[5]   Recent trends in work-related cumulative trauma disorders of the upper extremities in the United States: An evaluation of possible reasons [J].
Brogmus, GE ;
Sorock, GS ;
Webster, BS .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1996, 38 (04) :401-411
[6]  
Cherniack MG, 1996, OCCUP MED, V11, P513
[7]   Video display terminal workstation improvement program: I. Baseline associations between musculoskeletal discomfort and ergonomic features of workstations [J].
Demure, B ;
Luippold, RS ;
Bigelow, C ;
Ali, D ;
Mundt, KA ;
Liese, B .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2000, 42 (08) :783-791
[8]  
*EARTH TECH INC JO, 1996, USAF JOB REQ PHYS DE
[9]   Occupational upper extremity disorders in the federal workforce - Prevalence, health care expenditures, and patterns of work disability [J].
Feuerstein, M ;
Miller, VL ;
Burrell, LM ;
Berger, R .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1998, 40 (06) :546-555
[10]   Development of a screen for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with work-related upper extremity disorders [J].
Feuerstein, M ;
Huang, GD ;
Haufler, AJ ;
Miller, JK .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2000, 42 (07) :749-761