Bureaucracy in Criminal Justice A Study of Criminogen Factors in Law Enforcement on Narcotics Crime Settlement

被引:0
作者
Raharjo, Agus [1 ]
Saefudin, Yusuf [2 ]
机构
[1] Jenderal Soedirman Univ, Fac Law, Purwokerto, Indonesia
[2] Indonesian Teachers Assoc Victimizat, Purwokerto, Indonesia
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE (ICAS 2017) | 2017年 / 43卷
关键词
bureaucracy; criminal justice; legal behavior; integrated assessment; law enforcement;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
The criminal justice system is conducted through bureaucracy, with hope that law enforcement can proceed smoothly, efficiently and responsibly. However, this does not apply in the settlement of narcotics cases. The research method used to solve the problem is the approach toward law as law in action. The determination of a user as an addict, a suspect/convicted person is carried out by court based result assessment from Integrated Assessment Team.. The Team works through a bureaucracy and procedures. Regulation as the legal basis for the work of assessment teams which are unclear, overlapping, and bad behavior of law enforcement apparatus. It resulted in the assessments that oftentimes are being formally defective, so that the result cannot be used by the court as evidence. This fact indicates that the workings of the law through the bureaucracy cannot be separated from bureaucratic failure.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 10
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Ananda S., 2008, JURNAL HUKUM JUSTITA, V26, P178
[2]  
Azwardi, 2002, THESIS
[3]  
Hanadi S., 2010, JURNAL DINAMIKA HUKU, V10, P8
[4]  
Muladi, 1995, MAIN LINE CRIMINAL J
[5]  
Peter M.B, 1987, BIROKRASI DALAM MASY
[6]  
Rahardjo S., 2009, HUKUM DAN PERILAKU H
[7]  
Rahardjo S., 2007, LAW FLOW CRITICA NOT
[8]  
Rahardjo S., 1985, SEVERAL THOUGHTS INT
[9]  
Raharjo A., 2013, JURNAL DINAMIKA HUKU, V13, P59
[10]  
Raharjo A., 2015, JURNAL MIMBAR HUKUM, V27, P432