Neuromodulatory hacking: a review of the technology and security risks of spinal cord stimulation

被引:4
作者
Markosian, Christopher [1 ]
Taruvai, Varun S. [1 ]
Mammis, Antonios [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Neurol Surg, 90 Bergen St,Suite 8100, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
关键词
Chronic pain; Cybersecurity; Hacking; Implantable pulse generator; Neuromodulation; Spinal cord stimulation; 10-KHZ HIGH-FREQUENCY; BACK;
D O I
10.1007/s00701-020-04592-3
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a neuromodulatory technique used to relieve chronic pain. Previous instances of malicious remote control of implantable medical devices, including insulin delivery pumps and implantable cardiac defibrillators, have been documented. Though no cases of neuromodulatory hacking have been recorded outside of the academic setting, an understanding of SCS technology and the possible consequences of manipulation is important in promoting safety. Methods We review the components and implantation protocol of a SCS system, the functionality and technological specifications for SCS systems in the global market based on their device manuals, and patient- and clinician-specific adjustable factors. Furthermore, we assess documented instances of implantable medical device hacking and speculate on the potential harms of targeting SCS systems. Results SCS systems from Abbott Laboratories, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Nevro have unique functionality and technological specifications. Six parameters in device control can potentially be targeted and elicit various harms, including loss of therapeutic effect, accelerated battery drainage, paresthesia in unintended locations, muscle weakness or dysfunction, tissue burn, and electrical shock. Conclusions Based on the history of implantable medical device hacking, SCS systems may also be susceptible to manipulation. As the prevalence of SCS use increases and SCS systems continuously evolve in the direction of wireless control and compatibility with mobile devices, appropriate measures should be taken by manufacturers and governmental agencies to ensure safety.
引用
收藏
页码:3213 / 3219
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A review of spinal cord stimulation systems for chronic pain
    Verrills, Paul
    Sinclair, Chantelle
    Barnard, Adele
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2016, 9 : 481 - 492
  • [22] Is Spinal Cord Stimulation Safe? A Review of its Complications
    Bendersky, Damian
    Yampolsky, Claudio
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 82 (06) : 1359 - 1368
  • [23] Spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain
    Fontaine, D.
    REVUE NEUROLOGIQUE, 2021, 177 (07) : 838 - 842
  • [24] Innovations in spinal cord stimulation for pain
    Lempka, Scott F.
    Patil, Parag G.
    CURRENT OPINION IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 8 : 51 - 60
  • [25] Anatomic Considerations for Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Levy, Robert M.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2014, 17 : 2 - 11
  • [26] Permanent trials for spinal cord stimulation
    Bandlamuri, Sruti
    Harland, Tessa A.
    Pilitsis, Julie G.
    Sukul, Vishad V.
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2025, 25 (02)
  • [27] Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Rock, Andrew K.
    Huy Truong
    Park, Yunseo Linda
    Pilitsis, Julie G.
    NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2019, 30 (02) : 169 - +
  • [28] Retrospective analysis on the effect of spinal cord stimulation on opioid consumption
    Barpujari, Awinita
    Erdek, Michael A.
    PAIN MANAGEMENT, 2021, 11 (02) : 123 - 132
  • [29] A Review of the Prospera Spinal Cord Stimulation System with Multiphase Stimulation and Proactive Care
    Naidu, Ramana K.
    Kapural, Leonardo
    Li, Sean
    Tourje, Caitlin
    Rutledge, Joseph
    Dickerson, David
    Lubenow, Timothy R.
    CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2025, 29 (01)
  • [30] Technological Innovation in Spinal Cord Stimulation: Use of a Newly Developed Delivery Device for Introduction of Spinal Cord Stimulation Leads
    Loge, David
    De Coster, Olivier
    Washburn, Stephanie
    NEUROMODULATION, 2012, 15 (04): : 392 - 401