School districts and their local food supply chains

被引:15
作者
Christensen, Libby O. [1 ]
Jablonski, Becca B. R. [1 ]
O'Hara, Jeffrey K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Agr Mkt Serv, USDA, Washington, DC 20250 USA
关键词
Farm to school; food hubs; farm viability; intermediated sales; supply chains; FARM; PARTICIPATION; PROGRAMS; MOVEMENT; COSTS; LEVEL; HUBS;
D O I
10.1017/S1742170517000540
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The 2015 Farm to School Census reports that during the 2013-2014 school year there were over 5200 farm to school (FTS) programs in the USA that involved 39,000 schools and 24.1 million children. These FTS programs are intended, in part, to increase market access and therefore the viability of farms and ranches. Accordingly, the majority of FTS programs involve local food procurement directly from farmers, from non-traditional suppliers that market locally branded food products such as 'food hubs', or from traditional suppliers such distributors and food service management companies. Yet, there is reason to believe that transaction costs vary based on the supply chain that schools use to procure local food. Moreover, that the supply chain that schools use to procure local food has a relationship with school's expenditures on local food. We use the 2015 Farm to School Census to estimate the relationship between school district's local food expenditures per student and supply chain structure. We analyzed data using ordinary least squares regressions, controlling for the region of the USA, the type of local food products purchased, and other school-specific characteristics. Importantly, we find a negative and significant relationship between school district's non-milk local food expenditure per student, and purchases directly from the farm and from non-traditional suppliers. This implies that schools that purchase local food from traditional distributors are likely to have higher on average expenditures per student compared with schools that purchase local food directly from farmers or non-traditional distributors. Results point to the need for additional research in determining the efficacy of policies to support direct and non-traditional FTS marketing arrangements.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 215
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, DAIRY INDUSTRY, pA15
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, TRENDS US LOCAL REGI
[3]  
Arnold I, 2008, JOURNAL OF HUNGER EN, V3, P229, DOI DOI 10.1080/19320240802244025
[4]   Exploring Localized Economic Dynamics: Methods-Driven Case Studies of Transformation and Growth in Agricultural and Food Markets [J].
Bauman, Allison ;
McFadden, Dawn Thilmany .
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY, 2017, 31 (03) :244-254
[5]  
Becot Florence., 2017, Choices, V32, P1
[6]  
Botkins ER, 2015, SAN FRANC CA AAEA WA
[7]   Are local food and the local food movement taking us where we want to go? Or are we hitching our wagons to the wrong stars? [J].
DeLind, Laura B. .
AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, 2011, 28 (02) :273-283
[8]  
Dimitri C., 2012, Journal of Food Distribution Research, V43, P112
[9]   The Evolution of the School Food and Farm to School Movement in the United States: Connecting Childhood Health, Farms, and Communities [J].
Feenstra, Gail ;
Ohmart, Jeri .
CHILDHOOD OBESITY, 2012, 8 (04) :280-289
[10]   Food Hubs: Definitions, Expectations, and Realities [J].
Fischer, Micaela ;
Pirog, Rich ;
Hamm, Michael W. .
JOURNAL OF HUNGER & ENVIRONMENTAL NUTRITION, 2015, 10 (01) :92-99