Semantic interoperability of GIS and MCDA tools for environmental assessment and decision making

被引:37
作者
Jelokhani-Niaraki, Mohammadreza [1 ]
Sadeghi-Niaraki, Abolghasem [2 ,3 ]
Choi, Soo-Mi [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Fac Geog, Dept GIS & Remote Sensing, Tehran, Iran
[2] KN Toosi Univ Technol, Fac Geodesy & Geomat, Geoinformat Technol Ctr Excellence, Tehran, Iran
[3] Sejong Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Environmental assessment and decision making; GIS; MCDA; Semantic interoperability; Ontology; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; SPATIAL MULTICRITERIA EVALUATION; SITE SELECTION PROBLEM; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION; SUPPORT-SYSTEM; SUITABILITY; ONTOLOGY; WEB; VULNERABILITY; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.11.011
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
A promising approach to environmental assessment and decision making analyses is based on integrating Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) and GIS tools. Integration of GIS and MCDA tools can be potentially achieved through interoperability, where these tools can exchange relevant information to tackle a particular environmental problem. However, the problem of semantic heterogeneity caused by different meanings of data, terminologies, and models used in GIS and MCDA has been recognized as an obstacle in the interoperability of these tools. Conventionally, exchange of data between GIS and MCDA systems for environmental applications relies on prior knowledge to mediate meanings between the two components. This paper proposes an ontology-enabled framework for semantic interoperability of GIS and MCDA web services. In particular, this study has made significant contribution to environmental decision making by providing an interoperable framework to exchange environmental data with intended and unambiguous meanings between GIS and MCDA services. (c) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 122
页数:19
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]   Multicriteria decision analysis based on analytic hierarchy process in GIS environment for siting nuclear power plant in Egypt [J].
Abudeif, A. M. ;
Moneim, A. A. Abdel ;
Farrag, A. F. .
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2015, 75 :682-692
[2]   Geospatial information standards. A comparative study of approaches in the standardisation of geospatial information [J].
Albrecht, J .
COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 1999, 25 (01) :9-24
[3]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[4]   Semantic Ontology Mapping for Interoperability of Learning Resource Systems using a rule-based reasoning approach [J].
Arch-int, Ngamnij ;
Arch-int, Somjit .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2013, 40 (18) :7428-7443
[5]   GIS-based environmental assessment of wind energy systems for spatial planning: A case study from Western Turkey [J].
Aydin, Nazli Yonca ;
Kentel, Elcin ;
Duzgun, Sebnem .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2010, 14 (01) :364-373
[6]   A collaborative (web-GIS) framework based on empirical data collected from three case studies in Europe for risk management of hydro-meteorological hazards [J].
Aye, Zar Chi ;
Sprague, Teresa ;
Cortes, Vivian Juliette ;
Prenger-Berninghoff, Kathrin ;
Jaboyedoff, Michel ;
Derron, Marc-Henri .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2016, 15 :10-23
[7]   Multi-criteria decision making in ontologies [J].
Bastinos, Ana Sasa ;
Krisper, Marjan .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2013, 222 :593-610
[8]  
Batsakis S., 2010, P 6 INT C SEM SYST
[9]   Enabling the geospatial Semantic Web with Parliament and GeoSPARQL [J].
Battle, Robert ;
Kolas, Dave .
SEMANTIC WEB, 2012, 3 (04) :355-370
[10]   A spatio-temporal ontology for geographic information integration [J].
Bittner, Thomas ;
Donnelly, Maureen ;
Smith, Barry .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2009, 23 (06) :765-798