Comparison of the effects of two different types of calcium supplementation on markers of bone metabolism in a postmenopausal osteopenic population with low calcium intake: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial

被引:14
作者
Albertazzi, P
Steel, SA
Howarth, EM
Purdie, DW
机构
[1] Univ Hull, Ctr Metab Bone Dis, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7RX, N Humberside, England
[2] Univ Hull, Appl Stat Ctr, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7RX, N Humberside, England
关键词
calcium; postmenopausal osteoporosis; food supplements; bone markers; bone density; calcium tolerability;
D O I
10.1080/13697130310001651454
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate calcium supplements in postmenopausal women. Calcium supplements in postmenopausal women with a low calcium intake have been shown to prevent osteoporotic vertebral fracture, but calcium is variably absorbed and often poorly tolerated, which may limit effectiveness. Methods The study compared the efficacy and tolerability of 500 mg/day of calcium in the form of ossein-hydroxyapatite (OHC) versus 500 mg/day of tricalcium phosphate (TCP) and placebo in the prevention of postmenopausal bone loss. This was a prospective randomized study enrolling 153 postmenopausal osteopenic women. Serum and urine markers of bone turnover were collected at 3 and 6 months. Bone density measurement was performed at baseline and 6 months in all participants, and at 12 months in women taking OHC. Results At 3 and 6 months, both TCP and OHC decreased serum markers of bone formation significantly, compared with placebo. At 6 months, TCP and OHC decreased osteocalcin by 9.9% and 12.3%, respectively; the aminoterminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP) was decreased by 5.3% and 6.3%, respectively; bone-specific alkaline phosphatase was decreased by 4.3% and 6.7%, respectively, compared with baseline. The effects on bone resorption markers or on bone mineral density did not reach statistical significance, although OHC increased bone density by 0.8% at the spine at 12 months. Both forms of calcium were well tolerated and did not differ from placebo in terms of side-effects. Conclusions: While both OHC and TCP were well tolerated and significantly reduced bone turnover markers, the effect of ossein-hydroxyapatite seems slightly superior to that of tricalcium phosphate.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 40
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   THE INFLUENCE OF OSSEINHYDROXYAPATITE COMPOUND (OSSOPAN) ON THE HEALING OF A BONE DEFECT [J].
ANNEFELD, M ;
CAVIEZEL, R ;
SCHACHT, E ;
SCHICKETANZ, KH .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 1986, 10 (04) :241-250
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, JAMA, V272, P1942
[3]   THE EFFECT OF CALCIUM SUPPLEMENTATION ON THE CIRCADIAN-RHYTHM OF BONE-RESORPTION [J].
BLUMSOHN, A ;
HERRINGTON, K ;
HANNON, RA ;
SHAO, P ;
EYRE, DR ;
EASTELL, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1994, 79 (03) :730-735
[4]  
BUCLIN T, 1986, SCHWEIZ MED WSCHR, V116, P1780
[5]  
CUMMING RG, 1990, CALCIFIED TISSUE INT, V47, P194
[6]  
Davey DA, 1997, S AFR MED J, V87, P902
[7]   Effect of calcium and vitamin D supplementation on bone, density in men and women 65 years of age or older [J].
DawsonHughes, B ;
Harris, SS ;
Krall, EA ;
Dallal, GE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 337 (10) :670-676
[8]  
Draper MW, 1996, J BONE MINER RES, V11, P835
[9]  
ELDERS PJM, 1994, J BONE MINER RES, V9, P963
[10]  
GARNERO P, 2001, OSTEOPOROSIS, V2, P459, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-012470862-4/50061-1