The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning

被引:255
作者
Thompson, Penny [1 ]
机构
[1] Oklahoma State Univ, Sch Educ Studies Educ Technol, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
关键词
Digital natives; Technology use; NEURAL PLASTICITY; BRAIN; IMMIGRANTS; FRAMEWORK; DEBATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.022
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This study investigated the claims made in the popular press about the "digital native" generation as learners. Because students' lives today are saturated with digital media at a time when their brains are still developing, many popular press authors claim that this generation of students thinks and learns differently than any generation that has come before, but the evidence to support these claims is scarce. This study used a survey to gather data on the technology use of university freshmen, the degree to which they identified with the claims being made about their approaches to learning, and the productiveness (in terms of focused attention, deep processing, and persistence) of their approaches to learning. Valid surveys were received from 388 freshmen at a large Midwestern land grant university. A factor analysis was used to identify meaningful patterns of technology use, and descriptive statistics, analysis of correlations, and extreme group t-tests were used to explore the relationships between technology use patterns and learning characteristics. The findings indicate some positive correlations between use of digital technology and the characteristics ascribed in the popular press to the digital native learners, and negative correlations between some categories of technology use and the productiveness of student learning behaviors. Overall, however, the small to moderate relationships suggest a less deterministic relationship between technology and learning than what the popular press writers claim. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 33
页数:22
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Becoming a web-based learner: registered nurses' experiences [J].
Atack, L .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2003, 44 (03) :289-297
[2]  
Bauerlein M., 2008, DUMBEST GENERATION D
[3]   Beyond the 'digital natives' debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students' technology experiences [J].
Bennett, S. ;
Maton, K. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2010, 26 (05) :321-331
[4]   The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence [J].
Bennett, Sue ;
Maton, Karl ;
Kervin, Lisa .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 39 (05) :775-786
[5]   Development of the adolescent brain: implications for executive function and social cognition [J].
Blakemore, SJ ;
Choudhury, S .
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 47 (3-4) :296-312
[6]   Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging while reading [J].
Bowman, Laura L. ;
Levine, Laura E. ;
Waite, Bradley M. ;
Gendron, Michael .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2010, 54 (04) :927-931
[7]  
Bruer JT, 1998, EDUC LEADERSHIP, V56, P14
[8]  
Buchanan R., 2009, Dialogue and Difference: The Sorry Story of the Digital Native Retrieved 16 setembro 2011, from
[9]  
Carr N., 2020, The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains.
[10]   Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice [J].
Cordova, DI ;
Lepper, MR .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 88 (04) :715-730