Methane emissions, body composition, and rumen fermentation traits of beef heifers differing in residual feed intake

被引:105
作者
Fitzsimons, C. [1 ,2 ]
Kenny, D. A. [3 ]
Deighton, M. H. [4 ]
Fahey, A. G. [2 ]
McGee, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] TEAGASC, Livestock Syst Res Dept, Anim & Grassland Res & Innovat Ctr, Dunsany, Meath, Ireland
[2] UCD Sch Agr & Food Sci, Dublin 4, Ireland
[3] TEAGASC, Anim & Biosci Res Dept, Anim & Grassland Res & Innovat Ctr, Dunsany, Meath, Ireland
[4] Ellinbank, Dept Primary Ind, Future Farming Syst Res Dept, Warragul, Vic, Australia
关键词
beef heifer; body composition; grass silage; methane; residual feed intake; rumen fermentation; SUPPLEMENTARY CONCENTRATE LEVEL; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; HEXAFLUORIDE SF6 TRACER; PHENOTYPIC RELATIONSHIPS; ENERGY-REQUIREMENTS; GENETIC-PARAMETERS; GRAZED GRASS; SUCKLER COWS; PERFORMANCE; CATTLE;
D O I
10.2527/jas.2013-6956
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
This study examined the relationship of residual feed intake (RFI) and performance with methane emissions, rumen fermentation, and digestion in beef heifers. Individual DMI and growth performance were measured for 22 Simmental heifers (mean initial BW 449 kg, SD = 46.2 kg) offered grass silage ad libitum for 120 d. Ultrasonically scanned muscle and fat depth, BCS, muscularity score, skeletal measurements, blood variables, rumen fermentation (via stomach tube), and total tract digestibility (indigestible marker) were measured. Methane production was estimated using the sulfur hexafluoride tracer gas technique over two 5-d periods beginning on d 20 and 75 of the RFI measurement period. Phenotypic RFI was calculated as actual DMI minus expected DMI. The residuals of the regression of DMI on ADG and midtest metabolic body weight, using all heifers, were used to compute individual RFI coefficients. Heifers were ranked by RFI and assigned to low (efficient), medium, or high (inefficient) groupings. Overall ADG and DMI were 0.58 kg (SD = 0.18) and 7.40 kg (SD = 0.72), respectively. High-RFI heifers consumed 9 and 15% more (P < 0.05) than medium-and low-RFI groups, respectively. Body weight, growth, skeletal, and composition traits did not differ (P > 0.05) between low-and high-RFI groups. High-RFI heifers had higher concentrations of plasma glucose (6%) and urea (13%) and lower concentrations of plasma creatinine (9%) than low-RFI heifers (P < 0.05). Rumen pH and apparent in vivo digestibility did not differ (P > 0.05) between RFI groups, although acetate: propionate ratio was lowest (P = 0.07) for low-RFI (3.5) and highest for high-RFI (4.6) heifers. Methane production expressed as grams per day or grams per kilogram metabolic body weight was greater (P < 0.05) for high (297 g/d and 2.9 g/kg BW0.75) compared with low (260 g/d and 2.5 g/kg BW0.75) RFI heifers, with medium (275 g/d and 2.7 g/kg BW0.75) RFI heifers being intermediate. Regression analysis indicated that a 1 kg DM/d increase in RFI was associated with a 23 g/d increase (P = 0.09) in methane emissions. Results suggest that improved RFI will reduce methane emissions without affecting productivity of growing beef cattle.
引用
收藏
页码:5789 / 5800
页数:12
相关论文
共 69 条
[11]   The relationship of various muscular and skeletal scores and ultrasound measurements in the live animal, and carcass classification scores with carcass composition and value of bulls [J].
Conroy, S. B. ;
Drennan, M. J. ;
Kenny, D. A. ;
McGee, M. .
LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2010, 127 (01) :11-21
[12]   Ruminant enteric methane mitigation: a review [J].
Cottle, D. J. ;
Nolan, J. V. ;
Wiedemann, S. G. .
ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2011, 51 (06) :491-514
[13]  
Crews DH, 2005, GENET MOL RES, V4, P152
[14]   A review of whole farm systems models of greenhouse gas emissions from beef and dairy cattle production systems [J].
Crosson, P. ;
Shalloo, L. ;
O'Brien, D. ;
Lanigan, G. J. ;
Foley, P. A. ;
Boland, T. M. ;
Kenny, D. A. .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 166-67 :29-45
[15]   Genetic associations between feed efficiency measured in a performance test station and performance of growing cattle in commercial beef herds [J].
Crowley, J. J. ;
Evans, R. D. ;
Mc Hugh, N. ;
Pabiou, T. ;
Kenny, D. A. ;
McGee, M. ;
Crews, D. H., Jr. ;
Berry, D. P. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2011, 89 (11) :3382-3393
[16]   Phenotypic and genetic parameters for different measures of feed efficiency in different breeds of Irish performance-tested beef bulls [J].
Crowley, J. J. ;
McGee, M. ;
Kenny, D. A. ;
Crews, D. H., Jr. ;
Evans, R. D. ;
Berry, D. P. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2010, 88 (03) :885-894
[17]   Performance, residual feed intake, digestibility, carcass traits, and profitability of Angus-Hereford steers housed in individual or group pens [J].
Cruz, G. D. ;
Rodriguez-Sanchez, J. A. ;
Oltjen, J. W. ;
Sainz, R. D. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2010, 88 (01) :324-329
[18]   Estimation of maintenance energy requirements of beef cattle and sheep [J].
Dawson, LER ;
Steen, RWJ .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1998, 131 :477-485
[19]   Effect of level of intake on digestion in cows: influence of animal genotype and nature of hay [J].
Doreau, M ;
Diawara, A .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2003, 81 (01) :35-45
[20]   Performance of spring-calving beef suckler cows and their progeny to slaughter on intensive and extensive grassland management systems [J].
Drennan, M. J. ;
McGee, M. .
LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2009, 120 (1-2) :1-12