Effect finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of IPS Empress 2 ceramic

被引:16
作者
Capelozza Boaventura, Juliana Maria [1 ]
Nishida, Rodrigo [1 ]
Elossais, Andre Afif [2 ]
Lima, Darlon Martins [3 ]
Santos Nunes Reis, Jose Mauricio [4 ]
Campos, Edson Alves [1 ]
de Andrade, Marcelo Ferrarezi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Dept Restorat Dent, Araraquara Sch Dent, BR-14801903 Araraquara, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Ctr Grande Dourados UNIGRAN, Dept Restorat Dent, Dourados, MS, Brazil
[3] Maranhao Fed Univ UFMA, Maranhao Sch Dent, Dept Dent 1, Sao Luis, MA, Brazil
[4] Univ Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Araraquara Sch Dent, BR-14801903 Araraquara, SP, Brazil
关键词
ceramics; dental polishing; surface roughness; FLEXURAL STRENGTH; PORCELAIN; WEAR; ENAMEL;
D O I
10.3109/00016357.2012.690570
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective. To evaluate the surface roughness of IPS Empress 2 ceramic when treated with different finishing/polishing protocols. Materials and methods. Sixteen specimens of IPS Empress 2 ceramic were made from wax patterns obtained using a stainless steel split mold. The specimens were glazed (Stage 0-S0, control) and divided into two groups. The specimens in Group 1 (G1) were finished/polished with a KG Sorensen diamond point (S1), followed by KG Sorensen siliconized points (S2) and final polishing with diamond polish paste (S3). In Group 2 (G2), the specimens were finished/polished using a Shofu diamond point (S1), as well as Shofu siliconized points (S2) and final polishing was performed using Porcelize paste (S3). After glazing (S0) and following each polishing procedure (S1, S2 or S3), the surface roughness was measured using TALYSURF Series 2. The average surface roughness results were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc tests (alpha = 0.01) Results. All of the polishing procedures yielded higher surface roughness values when compared to the control group (S0). S3 yielded lower surface roughness values when compared to S1 and S2. Conclusions. The proposed treatments negatively affected the surface roughness of the glazed IPS Empress 2 ceramic.
引用
收藏
页码:438 / 443
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
al-Wahadni A, 1998, J Can Dent Assoc, V64, P580
[2]  
Al-Wahadni A, 2006, QUINTESSENCE INT, V37, P311
[3]   An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of glazed, unglazed and refinished dental porcelain on an opposing material [J].
Al-Wahadni, AM ;
Martin, DM .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1999, 26 (06) :538-546
[4]   Effect of sandblasting, grinding, polishing and glazing on the flexural strength of two pressable all-ceramic dental materials [J].
Albakry, M ;
Guazzato, M ;
Swain, MV .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2004, 32 (02) :91-99
[5]   Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: A review of the literature [J].
Bollen, CML ;
Lambrechts, P ;
Quirynen, M .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1997, 13 (04) :258-269
[6]  
Chu FCS, 2000, INT J PROSTHODONT, V13, P66
[7]   The influence of surface roughness on porcelain strength [J].
de Jager, N ;
Feilzer, AJ ;
Davidson, CL .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2000, 16 (06) :381-388
[8]   Wear of low-fusing dental porcelains [J].
Derand, P ;
Vereby, P .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1999, 81 (04) :460-463
[9]  
Finger WJ, 2000, AM J DENT, V13, P8
[10]  
Fuzzi M, 1996, INT J PROSTHODONT, V9, P452