Relative evaluation of regression tools for urban area electrical energy demand forecasting

被引:114
作者
Johannesen, Nils Jakob [1 ]
Kolhe, Mohan [1 ]
Goodwin, Morten [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Agder, Fac Engn & Sci, POB 422, NO-4604 Kristiansand, Norway
关键词
Electrical energy demand forecasting; Impact of meteorological parameters on demand forecasting; Smart-grid management; Machine learning; Regression tools; Random forest regressor; K-nearest neighbour regressor; Linear regressor;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.108
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Load forecasting is the most fundamental application in Smart-Grid, which provides essential input to Demand Response, Topology Optimization and Abnormally Detection, facilitating the integration of intermittent clean energy sources. In this work, several regression tools are analyzed using larger datasets for urban area electrical load forecasting. The regression tools which are used are Random Forest Regressor, k-Nearest Neighbour Regressor and Linear Regressor. This work explores the use of regression tool for regional electric load forecasting by correlating lower distinctive categorical level (season, day of the week) and weather parameters. The regression analysis has been done on continuous time basis as well as vertical time axis approach. The vertical time approach is considering a sample time period (e.g seasonally and weekly) of data for four years and has been tested for the same time period for the consecutive year. This work has uniqueness in electrical demand forecasting using regression tools through vertical approach and it also considers the impact of meteorological parameters. This vertical approach uses less amount of data compare to continuous time-series as well as neural network techniques. A correlation study, where both the Pearson method and visual inspection, of the vertical approach depicts meaningful relation between pre-processing of data, test methods and results, for the regressors examined through Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). By examining the structure of various regressors they are compared for the lowest MAPE. Random Forest Regressor provides better short-term load prediction (30 min) and kNN offers relatively better long-term load prediction (24 h). (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 564
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[11]  
Hong T., 2010, IEEE PES GEN M, P1
[12]  
Johannesen N. J., 2018, 2018 3 INT C SMART S
[13]  
Jones Eric, 2001, SciPy: Open source scientific tools for Python
[14]  
Kohavi R., 1995, A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection, V14, P1137
[15]  
Lahouar A., 2015, IREC2015 The Sixth International Renewable Energy Congress, V2015, P1, DOI 10.1109/irec.2015.7110975
[16]  
Mastouri M., 2017, 2017 18 INT C SCI TE
[17]  
Paraven D., 2002, INFLUENCE TEMPERATUR
[18]  
Paterakis N. G., 2018, 2017 IEEE PES INN SM
[19]  
Patidar D, 2014, 2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREEN COMPUTING COMMUNICATION AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (ICGCCEE)
[20]  
Pedregosa F, 2011, J MACH LEARN RES, V12, P2825