Controlled Phase Interactions Between Pulsed Electric Fields, Ultrasonic Motion, and Magnetic Fields in an Anodic Dissolution Cell

被引:9
作者
Bradley, Curtis [1 ]
Samuel, Johnson [2 ]
机构
[1] US Army, RDECOM ARDEC, Benet Lab, Integrat Engn Lab, Watervliet, NY 12189 USA
[2] Rensselaer Polytech Inst, Dept Mech Aerosp & Nucl Engn, Troy, NY 12180 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME | 2018年 / 140卷 / 04期
关键词
FUNDAMENTAL-ASPECTS; DESIGN; ASSISTANCE; MECHANISM; MODULE; ECM;
D O I
10.1115/1.4038569
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper presents the design of a novel testbed that effectively combines pulsed electric field waveforms, ultrasonic velocity, and magnetic field waveforms in an anodic dissolution electrochemical machining (ECM) cell. The testbed consists of a custom three-dimensional (3D)-printed flow cell that is integrated with (i) a bipolar-pulsed ECM circuit, (ii) an ultrasonic transducer, and (iii) a custom-built high-frequency electromagnet. The driving voltages of the ultrasonic transducer and electromagnet are calibrated to achieve a timed workpiece velocity and magnetic field, respectively, in the machining area. The ECM studies conducted using this testbed reveal that phase-controlled waveform interactions between the three assistances affect both the material removal rate (MRR) and surface roughness (Ra) performance metrics. The triad-assisted ECM case involving phase-specific combinations of all three high-frequency (15.625 kHz) assistance waveforms is found to be capable of achieving a 52% increase in MRR while also simultaneously yielding a 78% improvement in the Ra value over the baseline pulsed-ECM case. This result is encouraging because assisted ECM processes reported in the literature typically improve only one of these performance metrics at the expense of the other. In general, the findings reported in this paper are expected to enable the realization of multifield assisted ECM testbeds using phase-specific input waveforms that change on-the-fly to yield preferential combinations of MRR and surface finish.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] MAGNETIC-FIELD EFFECTS ON MASS-TRANSPORT
    AABOUBI, O
    CHOPART, JP
    DOUGLADE, J
    OLIVIER, A
    GABRIELLI, C
    TRIBOLLET, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1990, 137 (06) : 1796 - 1804
  • [2] Cook N., 1967, DA19066AMC26BW MIT D
  • [3] ELECTROCHEMICAL MACHINING UNDER PULSED CURRENT CONDITIONS
    DATTA, M
    LANDOLT, D
    [J]. ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA, 1981, 26 (07) : 899 - 907
  • [4] The mechanism of improving machining accuracy of ECM by magnetic field
    Fan, ZJ
    Wang, TC
    Zhong, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 149 (1-3) : 409 - 413
  • [5] Magnetic electrochemical finishing machining
    Fang, JC
    Jin, ZJ
    Xu, WJ
    Shi, YY
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 129 (1-3) : 283 - 287
  • [6] Inman M., 2011, Proc. of SRF2011, P377
  • [7] Kozak J., 2004, J MANUF PROCESS, V6, P7, DOI [10.1016/s1526-6125(04)70055-9, DOI 10.1016/S1526-6125(04)70055-9, 10.1016/S1526-6125(04)70055-9]
  • [8] Electrochemical micromachining, polishing and surface structuring of metals: fundamental aspects and new developments
    Landolt, D
    Chauvy, PF
    Zinger, O
    [J]. ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA, 2003, 48 (20-22) : 3185 - 3201
  • [9] FUNDAMENTAL-ASPECTS OF ELECTROPOLISHING
    LANDOLT, D
    [J]. ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA, 1987, 32 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [10] Electrochemical micromachining: An introduction
    Leese, Rebecca J.
    Ivanov, Atanas
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 8 (01)