Quality Assessment of DSMs Produced from UAV Flights Georeferenced with On-Board RTK Positioning

被引:192
作者
Forlani, Gianfranco [1 ]
Dall'Asta, Elisa [1 ]
Diotri, Fabrizio [2 ]
di Cella, Umberto Morra [2 ]
Roncella, Riccardo [1 ]
Santise, Marina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Parma, Dept Engn & Architecture, Parco Area Sci 181-A, I-43124 Parma, Italy
[2] Environm Protect Agcy Valle dAosta, Climate Change Unit, Loc Grande Charriere 44, I-11020 St Christophe, AO, Italy
来源
REMOTE SENSING | 2018年 / 10卷 / 02期
关键词
UAV; GNSS-Assisted Aerial Triangulation; RTK; DSM; accuracy; repeatability; ground control points; checkpoints; FROM-MOTION PHOTOGRAMMETRY; GROUND CONTROL; SYSTEMATIC-ERROR; RECONSTRUCTION; TOPOGRAPHY; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.3390/rs10020311
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
High-resolution Digital Surface Models (DSMs) from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) imagery with accuracy better than 10 cm open new possibilities in geosciences and engineering. The accuracy of such DSMs depends on the number and distribution of ground control points (GCPs). Placing and measuring GCPs are often the most time-consuming on-site tasks in a UAV project. Safety or accessibility concerns may impede their proper placement, so either costlier techniques must be used, or a less accurate DSM is obtained. Photogrammetric blocks flown by drones with on-board receivers capable of RTK (real-time kinematic) positioning do not need GCPs, as camera stations at exposure time can be determined with cm-level accuracy, and used to georeference the block and control its deformations. This paper presents an experimental investigation on the repeatability of DSM generation from several blocks acquired with a RTK-enabled drone, where differential corrections were sent from a local master station or a network of Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS). Four different flights for each RTK mode were executed over a test field, according to the same flight plan. DSM generation was performed with three block control configurations: GCP only, camera stations only, and with camera stations and one GCP. The results show that irrespective of the RTK mode, the first and third configurations provide the best DSM inner consistency. The average range of the elevation discrepancies among the DSMs in such cases is about 6 cm (2.5 GSD, ground sampling density) for a 10-cm resolution DSM. Using camera stations only, the average range is almost twice as large (4.7 GSD). The average DSM accuracy, which was verified on checkpoints, turned out to be about 2.1 GSD with the first and third configurations, and 3.7 GSD with camera stations only.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Assessment of photogrammetric mapping accuracy based on variation ground control points number using unmanned aerial vehicle
    Aguera-Vega, Francisco
    Carvajal-Ramírez, Fernando
    Martinez-Carricondo, Patricio
    [J]. MEASUREMENT, 2017, 98 : 221 - 227
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2007, Photogrammetry: Geometry from Images and Laser Scans
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, THESIS I GEODESIE PH
  • [4] Testing Accuracy and Repeatability of UAV Blocks Oriented with GNSS-Supported Aerial Triangulation
    Benassi, Francesco
    Dall'Asta, Elisa
    Diotri, Fabrizio
    Forlani, Gianfranco
    di Cella, Umberto Morra
    Roncella, Riccardo
    Santise, Marina
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 9 (02)
  • [5] BILKER M, 1998, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM, V32, P2
  • [6] Performance of low-cost GNSS receiver for landslides monitoring: test and results
    Cina, Alberto
    Piras, Marco
    [J]. GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2015, 6 (5-7) : 497 - 514
  • [7] Reproducibility of UAV-based earth topography reconstructions based on Structure-from-Motion algorithms
    Clapuyt, Francois
    Vanacker, Veerle
    Van Oost, Kristof
    [J]. GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2016, 260 : 4 - 15
  • [8] UAV CAMERAS: OVERVIEW AND GEOMETRIC CALIBRATION BENCHMARK
    Cramer, M.
    Przybilla, H. -J.
    Zurhorst, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES IN GEOMATICS (VOLUME XLII-2/W6), 2017, 42-2 (W6): : 85 - 92
  • [9] Cramer M, 1999, PHOTOGRAMMETRIC WEEK '99, P59
  • [10] Cramer M., 2000, International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, V33, P198