Psychometric Validation of the English and French Versions of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)

被引:458
作者
Ashbaugh, Andrea R. [1 ]
Houle-Johnson, Stephanie [1 ]
Herbert, Christophe [2 ]
El-Hage, Wissam [3 ]
Brunet, Alain [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Sch Psychol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Psychiat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Tours, Inserm U930, Dept Psychiat, CHRU Tours, F-37041 Tours, France
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Psychiat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Dept Neurol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSES; ADMINISTERED PTSD SCALE; NONCLINICAL SAMPLE; TRAUMATIC EVENTS; SYMPTOMS; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0161645
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to assess the psychometric properties of a French version of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), a self-report measure of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, and to further validate the existing English version of the measure. Undergraduate students (n = 838 English, n = 262 French) completed the PCL-5 as well as other self-report symptom measures of PTSD and depression online. Both the English and French versions PCL-5 total scores demonstrated excellent internal consistency (English: alpha = .95; French: alpha = .94), and strong convergent and divergent validity. Strong internal consistency was also observed for each of the four subscales for each version (alpha's > .79). Test-retest reliability for the French version of the measure was also very good (r = .89). Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the four-factor DSM-5 model was not a good fit of the data. The seven-factor hybrid model best fit the data in each sample, but was only marginally superior to the six-factor anhedonia model. The French version of the PCL-5 demonstrated the same psychometric qualities as both the English version of the same measure and previous versions of the PCL. Thus clinicians serving French-speaking clients now have access to this highly used screening instrument. With regards to the structural validity of the PCL-5 and of the new PTSD diagnostic structure of the DSM-5, additional research is warranted. Replication of our results in clinical samples is much needed.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 44 条
[31]   Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling [J].
MacCallum, RC ;
Browne, MW ;
Sugawara, HM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 1996, 1 (02) :130-149
[32]   The diagnostic accuracy of the PTSD Checklist: A critical review [J].
McDonald, Scott D. ;
Calhoun, Patrick S. .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2010, 30 (08) :976-987
[33]  
Nezu A.M., 2000, PRACTITIONERS GUIDE
[34]   Confirmatory factor analysis of the PTSD checklist and the clinician-administered PTSD scale in disaster workers exposed to the World Trade Center Ground Zero [J].
Palmieri, Patrick A. ;
Weathers, Frank W. ;
Difede, JoAnn ;
King, Daniel W. .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 116 (02) :329-341
[35]  
RADLOFF L S, 1977, Applied Psychological Measurement, V1, P385, DOI 10.1177/014662167700100306
[36]   Mismatch of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and DSM-IV symptom clusters in a cancer sample:: Exploratory factor analysis of the PTSD checklist-Civilian version [J].
Shelby, RA ;
Golden-Kreutz, DM ;
Andersen, BL .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMATIC STRESS, 2005, 18 (04) :347-357
[37]   Confirmatory factor analyses of posttraumatic stress symptoms in deployed and nondeployed veterans of the Gulf War [J].
Simms, LJ ;
Watson, D ;
Doebbeling, BN .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 111 (04) :637-647
[38]  
Tabachnick B.G., 2014, USING MULTIVARIATE S, V6
[39]   The validation of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist Scale in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Nonclinical Subjects [J].
Ventureyra, VAG ;
Yao, SN ;
Cottraux, J ;
Note, I ;
De Mey-Guillard, C .
PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2002, 71 (01) :47-53
[40]  
Weathers F., 1993, PTSD CHECKLIST RELIA