Psychometric Validation of the English and French Versions of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)

被引:458
作者
Ashbaugh, Andrea R. [1 ]
Houle-Johnson, Stephanie [1 ]
Herbert, Christophe [2 ]
El-Hage, Wissam [3 ]
Brunet, Alain [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Sch Psychol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Psychiat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Tours, Inserm U930, Dept Psychiat, CHRU Tours, F-37041 Tours, France
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Psychiat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Dept Neurol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSES; ADMINISTERED PTSD SCALE; NONCLINICAL SAMPLE; TRAUMATIC EVENTS; SYMPTOMS; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0161645
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to assess the psychometric properties of a French version of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), a self-report measure of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, and to further validate the existing English version of the measure. Undergraduate students (n = 838 English, n = 262 French) completed the PCL-5 as well as other self-report symptom measures of PTSD and depression online. Both the English and French versions PCL-5 total scores demonstrated excellent internal consistency (English: alpha = .95; French: alpha = .94), and strong convergent and divergent validity. Strong internal consistency was also observed for each of the four subscales for each version (alpha's > .79). Test-retest reliability for the French version of the measure was also very good (r = .89). Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the four-factor DSM-5 model was not a good fit of the data. The seven-factor hybrid model best fit the data in each sample, but was only marginally superior to the six-factor anhedonia model. The French version of the PCL-5 demonstrated the same psychometric qualities as both the English version of the same measure and previous versions of the PCL. Thus clinicians serving French-speaking clients now have access to this highly used screening instrument. With regards to the structural validity of the PCL-5 and of the new PTSD diagnostic structure of the DSM-5, additional research is warranted. Replication of our results in clinical samples is much needed.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, SPSS STAT
[2]  
[Anonymous], LING CHAR CAN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, AMOS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5)
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, AM COMMUNITY SURVEY
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD
[8]  
[Anonymous], EUROPEAN PSYCHIAT
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, DOI DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2016, OTH INT ORG