Adsorbent density impact on gas storage capacities

被引:18
作者
Kunowsky, Mirko [1 ]
Suarez-Garcia, Fabian [2 ]
Linares-Solano, Angel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alicante, Dept Quim Inorgan, Grp Mat Carbonosos & Medio Ambiente, E-03080 Alicante, Spain
[2] INCAR CSIC, Inst Nacl Carbon, Oviedo 33080, Spain
关键词
Physisorption; High pressure hydrogen storage; Supercritical gas adsorption; Activated carbons; Metal-organic frameworks (MOF); METAL-ORGANIC FRAMEWORKS; ACTIVATED CARBON MONOLITHS; HYDROGEN STORAGE; HIGH-PRESSURE; ADSORPTION; TEMPERATURE; ISOTHERMS; METHANE; EXCESS; MOF-5;
D O I
10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.02.010
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
In the literature, different approaches, terminologies, concepts and equations are used for calculating gas storage capacities. Very often, these approaches are not well defined, used and/or determined, giving rise to significant misconceptions. Even more, some of these approaches, very much associated with the type of adsorbent material used (e.g., porous carbons or new materials such as COFs and MOFs), impede a suitable comparison of their performances for gas storage applications. We review and present the set of equations used to assess the total storage capacity for which, contrarily to the absolute adsorption assessment, all its experimental variables can be determined experimentally without assumptions, ensuring the comparison of different porous storage materials for practical application. These material-based total storage capacities are calculated by taking into account the excess adsorption, the bulk density (rho(bulk)) and the true density (rho(true)) of the adsorbent. The impact of the material densities on the results are investigated for an exemplary hydrogen isotherm obtained at room temperature and up to 20 MPa. It turns out that the total storage capacity on a volumetric basis, which increases with both, rho(bulk) and rho(true), is the most appropriate tool for comparing the performance of storage materials. However, the use of the total storage capacities on a gravimetric basis cannot be recommended, because low material bulk densities could lead to unrealistically high gravimetric values. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 52
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Effects of compression on the textural properties of porous solids
    Alcaniz-Monge, J.
    Trautwein, G.
    Perez-Cadenas, M.
    Roman-Martinez, M. C.
    [J]. MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS, 2009, 126 (03) : 291 - 301
  • [2] [Anonymous], TARG ONB HYDR STOR S
  • [3] Role of microporosity in hydrogen adsorption on templated nanoporous carbons
    Armandi, M.
    Bonelli, B.
    Arean, C. Otero
    Garrone, E.
    [J]. MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS, 2008, 112 (1-3) : 411 - 418
  • [4] Chemical hydrogen storage: 'material' gravimetric capacity versus 'system' gravimetric capacity
    Demirci, Umit B.
    Miele, Philippe
    [J]. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2011, 4 (09) : 3334 - 3341
  • [5] Application of metal-organic frameworks with coordinatively unsaturated metal sites in storage and separation of methane and carbon dioxide
    Dietzel, Pascal D. C.
    Besikiotis, Vasileios
    Blom, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY, 2009, 19 (39) : 7362 - 7370
  • [6] On the Existence of Negative Excess Isotherms for Argon Adsorption on Graphite Surfaces and in Graphitic Pores under Supercritical Conditions at Pressures up to 10,000 atm
    Do, D. D.
    Do, H. D.
    Fan, Chunyan
    Nicholson, D.
    [J]. LANGMUIR, 2010, 26 (07) : 4796 - 4806
  • [7] Dreisbach F, 2002, CHEM-ING-TECH, V74, P1353, DOI 10.1002/1522-2640(20021015)74:10<1353::AID-CITE1353>3.0.CO
  • [8] 2-K
  • [9] Chemical and Physical Solutions for Hydrogen Storage
    Eberle, Ulrich
    Felderhoff, Michael
    Schueth, Ferdi
    [J]. ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION, 2009, 48 (36) : 6608 - 6630
  • [10] Adsorption and diffusion of hydrogen and methane in 2D covalent organic frameworks
    Garberoglio, G.
    Vallauri, R.
    [J]. MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS, 2008, 116 (1-3) : 540 - 547