Short time effect of a self-referral to inpatient treatment for patients with severe mental disorders: a randomized controlled trial

被引:16
作者
Moljord, Inger Elise Opheim [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Helland-Hansen, Kristel Antine [1 ]
Salvesen, Oyvind [4 ]
Olso, Turid Moller [5 ]
Gudde, Camilla Buch [6 ,7 ]
Rise, Marit By [4 ]
Steinsbekk, Aslak [4 ]
Eriksen, Lasse [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] St Olavs Univ Hosp, Div Psychiat, Nidaros Community Mental Hlth Ctr, Ostmarkveien 21,Post Box 1893, N-7440 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Neurosci, Fac Med, Trondheim, Norway
[3] St Olavs Univ Hosp, Div Psychiat, Dept Res & Dev, Trondheim, Norway
[4] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Publ Hlth & Gen Practice, Fac Med, Trondheim, Norway
[5] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol Social Res AS, Norwegian Resource Ctr Community Mental Hlth, Trondheim, Norway
[6] St Olavs Univ Hosp, Forens Dept Broset, Ctr Res & Educ Forens Psychiat, Trondheim, Norway
[7] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Social Sci & Technol Management, Dept Social Work & Hlth Sci, Trondheim, Norway
来源
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH | 2016年 / 16卷
关键词
Self-referral to inpatient treatment; Patient controlled admission; Psychosis; User participation; Patient activation; SERVICE USERS EXPERIENCES; ACTIVATION MEASURE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; RECOVERY; SCHIZOPHRENIA; CARE; IMPLEMENTATION; GUIDANCE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-016-1712-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Service user participation is a central principle in mental healthcare, and the opportunity to self-refer to inpatient treatment is used to increase service user involvement and activation. The aim of this study was to investigate the short-term effect of a self-referral system in an inpatient rehabilitation unit at a community mental health center on patient activation and recovery in individuals with severe mental disorders. Methods: A randomized controlled study including 53 patients (41 % females, mean age 40 years). Twenty-six patients in the intervention group were given a contract for self-referral to inpatient treatment, limited to maximum 5 days and a quarantine time of 14 days between each stay. The control group (27 participants) received treatment as usual, and was offered the intervention after 1 year. The Patient Activation Measure was the primary outcome and secondary outcome was the Recovery Assessment Scale. Mixed models were used to assess group differences. Results: During the 4 months period, 15 (58 %) of 26 participants in the intervention group used the contract of self-referral to inpatient treatment. The intervention group had more admissions than the control group but both groups had a similar total use of inpatient days and out-patient consultations. The self-referral to inpatient treatment counted for 11 % of all inpatient days for the intervention group. There were no significant differences in the outcome between the groups on patient activation (estimated mean difference 2.7, 95 % confidence interval = -5.5 to 10.8, p = 0.52) or recovery (estimated mean difference 0.01, 95 % confidence interval = -0.3 to 0.3, p = 0.92). Conclusions: Giving persons with severe mental disorders the possibility to self-refer to inpatient treatment did not change their level of patient activation and recovery after 4 months and did not lead to increased use of health services. The cost-effectiveness and long-term effect of self-referral to inpatient treatment should be investigated further.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, LEVELS EVIDENCE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, HLTH SOC AFF VEIL FO
[4]  
Biringer E., 2015, Scandinavian Psychologist, V2, DOI DOI 10.15714/SCANDPSYCHOL.2.E6
[5]   Assessing the value of existing recovery measures for routine use in Australian mental health services [J].
Burgess, Philip ;
Pirkis, Jane ;
Coombs, Tim ;
Rosen, Alan .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 45 (04) :267-280
[6]   Assessing recovery from schizophrenia as an individual process. A review of self-report instruments [J].
Cavelti, M. ;
Kvrgic, S. ;
Beck, E. -M. ;
Kossowsky, J. ;
Vauth, R. .
EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 27 (01) :19-32
[7]   SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials [J].
Chan, An-Wen ;
Tetzlaff, Jennifer M. ;
Gotzsche, Peter C. ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Mann, Howard ;
Berlin, Jesse A. ;
Dickersin, Kay ;
Hrobjartsson, Asbjorn ;
Schulz, Kenneth F. ;
Parulekar, Wendy R. ;
Krleza-Jeric, Karmela ;
Laupacis, Andreas ;
Moher, David .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 346
[8]   Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: Scale development [J].
Chiba, Rie ;
Miyamoto, Yuki ;
Kawakami, Norito .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2010, 47 (03) :314-322
[9]   Recovery as a psychological construct [J].
Corrigan, PW ;
Giffort, D ;
Rashid, F ;
Leary, M ;
Okeke, I .
COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL, 1999, 35 (03) :231-239
[10]   Examining the factor structure of the recovery assessment scale [J].
Corrigan, PW ;
Salzer, M ;
Ralph, RO ;
Sangster, Y ;
Keck, L .
SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2004, 30 (04) :1035-1041