The value of and myths about enterprise architecture

被引:43
作者
Gong, Yiwei [1 ]
Janssen, Marijn [2 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Informat Management, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, Jaffalaan 5, NL-2628 BX Delft, Netherlands
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Enterprise architecture; IT architecture; Information architecture; Systematic literature review; Value; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; FRAMEWORK; MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS; DESIGN; MODELS; INTEROPERABILITY; INTEGRATION; CHALLENGES; SECURITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.006
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Enterprise Architecture (FA) has been embraced by many organizations to improve the value of their IT. Our systematic literature review (SLR) reveals that EA is a broad concept that is interpreted and used in many different ways. This breadth can be explained by the various starting points taken, and by the content-dependent nature of many EA efforts. Unsurprisingly, the literature presents diverse views on value creation and locates the value of EA in a broad range of areas. Only half of the articles provide empirical evidence supporting the EA value claims. Frequently, values are assumed to be the result of EA efforts, but many alternative explanations are possible. Based on the SLR findings, we identify EA myths that are attributable to an overly simplistic conceptualization of EA. These myths have their basis in the claim that EA is an instrument that can solve almost any kind of enterprise problem. This fails to acknowledge that EA in itself often does not provide value, but is an instrument enabling the creation of value. Based on our findings, we recommend demystifying EA by analysing the context-dependent mechanisms behind EA that result in value creation and developing rigorous evidence-based approaches to better understand EA.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 88 条
[61]  
OMB, 2012, COMM APPR FED ENT AR
[62]  
OMB, 2013, Federal enterprise architecture framework version 2
[63]   How to design the master data architecture: Findings from a case study at Bosch [J].
Otto, Boris .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2012, 32 (04) :337-346
[64]   Managing information security in a business network of machinery maintenance services business - Enterprise architecture as a coordination tool [J].
Pulkkinen, Mirja ;
Naumenko, Anton ;
Luostarinen, Karl .
JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2007, 80 (10) :1607-1620
[65]  
Rodrigues L., 2010, J. Enterp. Architect., V6, P27
[66]   Enterprise information systems state of the art: Past, present and future trends [J].
Romero, David ;
Vernadat, Francois .
COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2016, 79 :3-13
[67]  
Ross J.W., 2006, Enterprise architecture as strategy: Creating a foundation for business execution
[68]   Identifying and evaluating enterprise architecture risks using FMEA and fuzzy VIKOR [J].
Safari, Hossein ;
Faraji, Zahra ;
Majidian, Setareh .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2016, 27 (02) :475-486
[69]   Outcomes and success factors of enterprise IT architecture management: empirical insight from the international financial services industry [J].
Schmidt, Christian ;
Buxmann, Peter .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2011, 20 (02) :168-185
[70]   Enterprise architecture management and its role in corporate strategic management [J].
Simon, Daniel ;
Fischbach, Kai ;
Schoder, Detlef .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND E-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2014, 12 (01) :5-42