Evaluation of community web sites A case study of the Community Social Planning Council of Toronto web site

Purpose-The purpose of this paper is to explore an evaluation approach and to develop a model of web site evaluation that includes the specification of evaluation criteria, key issues to discuss and recommendations for improving the web site-in this case, that of the Community Social Planning Council of Toronto (CSPC-T). Design/methodology/approach-The research consisted of three phases: phase 1 involved selection of the general evaluation criteria for web sites, based on a review of the literature plus the collection of factual data on information systems related to the CSPC-T web site; phase 2 included a step-by-step evaluation of the existing CSPC-T web site based on the general criteria presented in phase 1; and phase 3 provided recommendations in association with the key issues identified in phase 2 in order to improve the CSPC-T web site, and developed the key components of the evaluation model. Findings-The evaluation of the CSPC-T web site found mostly positive results in terms of the content of the site and its ability to deliver information to the residents and local communities of Toronto. However, the design of the web site had some negative points requiring improvement, including site structure, page layout and interface design. Practical implications-The paper demonstrates a step-by-step, practical evaluation of community web sites. The research provided a detailed report to CSPC-T about its existing web site. This should be useful to CSPC-T in considering how to improve its web site or whether to redesign it to deliver information and services more effectively. Originality/value-This paper contributes to the knowledge base in the fields of community networks and web site evaluation, and to the improvement of the quality of information and service delivery to local communities via the web.