Non-parametric analysis of equity arbitrage

被引:0
作者
Vortelinos, Dimitrios I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lincoln Univ, Lincoln Business Sch, Lincoln, England
关键词
Arbitrage; Non-parametric; US equity markets; Evaluation; EXCHANGE MARKET; VOLATILITY; RISK; FUTURES; COINTEGRATION; EFFICIENCY; PRICE; EQUILIBRIUM; HYPOTHESIS; LIQUIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.iref.2014.05.004
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Arbitrage is non-parametrically examined and empirically analyzed in US equity markets. Firstly, analyzed are the properties of arbitrage; and secondly, the factors explaining arbitrage are tested. Empirical analysis concerns a decade of intraday data of five US equity indices and is also implemented in both daily and intraday frequencies. The cost-of-carry model (log base) significantly quantifies arbitrage in the US equity markets. The properties of the log-base arbitrage are similar to the ones expected and to those of the implied arbitrage as well. The significance of the cost-of-carry model (log-bases in the levels of price, return and volatility series) is also proved by rejecting the unbiasedness hypotheses of the model. The arbitrage price, return, volatility and correlation series are significantly explained by illiquidity. The Options/Stock trading volume ratio is significantly explained by arbitrage. The duration of arbitrage opportunities is 1.2 min (72 s), indicating that the market eliminates profitable deviations rather quickly. Volatility risk premium, jump risk, lagged arbitrage returns, realized skewness implied ratio, and option trading volume significantly explain arbitrage. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 216
页数:18
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Ackert LucyF., 2008, FINANCIAL MARKETS I, V17, P331, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0416.2008.00144.X
[2]   The distribution of realized exchange rate volatility [J].
Andersen, TG ;
Bollerslev, T ;
Diebold, FX ;
Labys, P .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 96 (453) :42-55
[3]   Roughing it up: Including jump components in the measurement, modeling, and forecasting of return volatility [J].
Andersen, Torben G. ;
Bollerslev, Tim ;
Diebold, Francis X. .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2007, 89 (04) :701-720
[4]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[5]   TESTING RATIONAL-EXPECTATIONS AND EFFICIENCY IN THE FOREIGN-EXCHANGE MARKET [J].
BAILLIE, RT ;
LIPPENS, RE ;
MCMAHON, PC .
ECONOMETRICA, 1983, 51 (03) :553-563
[6]  
Barndorff-Nielsen OleE., 2006, Journal of financial Econometrics, V4, p1. 1, DOI DOI 10.1093/JJFINEC/NBI022
[7]   TESTING THE UNBIASED FORWARD RATE HYPOTHESIS - EVIDENCE ON UNIT ROOTS, COINTEGRATION, AND STOCHASTIC COEFFICIENTS [J].
BARNHART, SW ;
SZAKMARY, AC .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 1991, 26 (02) :245-267
[8]   Volatility in Equilibrium: Asymmetries and Dynamic Dependencies [J].
Bollerslev, Tim ;
Sizova, Natalia ;
Tauchen, George .
REVIEW OF FINANCE, 2012, 16 (01) :31-80
[9]   Expected Idiosyncratic Skewness [J].
Boyer, Brian ;
Mitton, Todd ;
Vorkink, Keith .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2010, 23 (01) :169-202
[10]   ARBITRAGE, COINTEGRATION, AND TESTING THE UNBIASEDNESS HYPOTHESIS IN FINANCIAL-MARKETS [J].
BRENNER, RJ ;
KRONER, KF .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 1995, 30 (01) :23-42