Gadolinium-Enhanced Three-Dimensional Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Gradient-Echo (3D MP-RAGE) Imaging is Superior to Spin-Echo Imaging in Delineating Brain Metastases

被引:27
作者
Takeda, T.
Takeda, A.
Nagaoka, T.
Kunieda, E. [1 ]
Takemasa, K.
Watanabe, M.
Hatou, T.
Oguro, S.
Katayama, M.
机构
[1] Keio Univ, Dept Radiol, Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
关键词
Brain; magnetic resonance imaging; metastasis; MP-RAGE;
D O I
10.1080/02841850802477924
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Precisely defining the number and location of brain metastases is very important for establishing a treatment strategy for malignancies. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is now considered the best modality, various improvements in sequences are still being made. Purpose: To prospectively compare the diagnostic ability of three-dimensional, magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (3D MP-RAGE) imaging in detecting metastatic brain tumors, with that of two-dimensional spin-echo (2D SE) T1-weighted imaging. Material and Methods: A total of 123 examinations were included in this study, and 119 examinations from 88 patients with known malignancies were analyzed. All patients underwent T1- and T2-weighted 2D SE transverse imaging, followed by gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted transverse and coronal 2D SE imaging and 3D MP-RAGE transverse imaging. Four radiologists interpreted the images to compare the accuracy and the time required for interpretation for each imaging. Results: 3D MP-RAGE imaging was significantly better than 2D SE imaging for detecting metastatic brain lesions, regardless of the readers' experience. The sensitivities of the 3D MP-RAGE and 2D SE imaging for all observers were 0.81 vs. 0.80 (P0.05), specificities were 0.93 vs. 0.87 (P0.05), positive predictive values were 0.92 vs. 0.86 (P0.05), negative predictive values were 0.78 vs. 0.75 (P0.05), and accuracies were 0.84 vs. 0.78 (P0.05), respectively. There was no significant difference in the time required for image interpretation between the two modalities (15.64.0 vs. 15.44.1 min). Conclusion: 3D MP-RAGE imaging proved superior to 2D SE imaging in the detection of brain metastases.
引用
收藏
页码:1167 / 1173
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   BRAIN METASTASES - COMPARISON OF GADODIAMIDE INJECTION-ENHANCED MR-IMAGING AT STANDARD AND HIGH-DOSE, CONTRAST-ENHANCED CT AND NON-CONTRAST-ENHANCED MR-IMAGING [J].
AKESON, P ;
LARSSON, EM ;
KRISTOFFERSEN, DT ;
JONSSON, E ;
HOLTAS, S .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 1995, 36 (03) :300-306
[2]   MP RAGE - A 3-DIMENSIONAL, T1-WEIGHTED, GRADIENT-ECHO SEQUENCE - INITIAL EXPERIENCE IN THE BRAIN [J].
BRANTZAWADZKI, M ;
GILLAN, GD ;
NITZ, WR .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 182 (03) :769-775
[3]   Statistical power in observer-performance studies: Comparison of the receiver operating characteristic and free-response methods in tasks involving localization [J].
Chakraborty, D .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2002, 9 (02) :147-156
[4]   FREE-RESPONSE METHODOLOGY - ALTERNATE ANALYSIS AND A NEW OBSERVER-PERFORMANCE EXPERIMENT [J].
CHAKRABORTY, DP ;
WINTER, LHL .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 174 (03) :873-881
[5]  
DAVIS PC, 1991, AM J NEURORADIOL, V12, P293
[6]   Importance of MR technique for stereotactic radiosurgery [J].
Donahue, BR ;
Goldberg, JD ;
Golfinos, JG ;
Knopp, EA ;
Comiskey, J ;
Rush, SC ;
Han, K ;
Mukhi, V ;
Cooper, JS .
NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2003, 5 (04) :268-274
[7]   RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC RATING ANALYSIS - GENERALIZATION TO THE POPULATION OF READERS AND PATIENTS WITH THE JACKKNIFE METHOD [J].
DORFMAN, DD ;
BERBAUM, KS ;
METZ, CE .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1992, 27 (09) :723-731
[8]  
Filippi M, 1998, AM J NEURORADIOL, V19, P235
[9]   INVERSION RECOVERY SNAPSHOT FLASH MR IMAGING [J].
HAASE, A ;
MATTHAEI, D ;
BARTKOWSKI, R ;
DUHMKE, E ;
LEIBFRITZ, D .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1989, 13 (06) :1036-1040
[10]   A 3D T1-WEIGHTED GRADIENT-ECHO SEQUENCE FOR ROUTINE USE IN 3D RADIOSURGICAL TREATMENT PLANNING OF BRAIN METASTASES - FIRST CLINICAL-RESULTS [J].
HAWIGHORST, H ;
SCHAD, LR ;
GADEMANN, G ;
BLUML, S ;
KNOPP, MV ;
WENZ, F ;
VANKAICK, G .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1995, 5 (01) :19-25