The effects of the 2006 SEC executive compensation disclosure rules on managerial incentives

被引:4
|
作者
Espahbodi, Reza [1 ]
Liu, Nan [2 ]
Westbrook, Amy [3 ]
机构
[1] Washburn Univ, Sch Business, 1700 SW Coll Ave, Topeka, KS 66621 USA
[2] Peking Univ, HSBC Business Sch, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
[3] Washburn Univ, Sch Law, 1700 SW Coll Ave, Topeka, KS 66621 USA
关键词
Executive compensation; payout policy; Real earnings management; Accruals management;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcae.2016.09.003
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
In 2006, the SEC amended the disclosure requirements for executive compensation and stock ownership. This paper examines the effects of these amendments on (1) the association between equity-based executive incentives and firm payout choice, and (2) the association between executive compensation and earnings management. We find that after the effective date of the SEC rules, the positive associations between executive stock option holdings and firm open-market repurchases, and between executive shareholdings and firm dividend payouts, have weakened. In addition, the positive associations between bonus and discretionary accruals, between bonus and real earnings management, and between equity compensation and real earnings management, have decreased. In general, these findings are consistent with the notion that the 2006 SEC disclosure rules lowered management's self-interested actions by mitigating the information asymmetry between investors and managers. (c) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 256
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Earnings vs. stock-price based incentives in managerial compensation contracts
    Bernardo, Antonio E.
    Cai, Hongbin
    Luo, Jiang
    REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES, 2016, 21 (01) : 316 - 348
  • [32] Decarbonizing the boardroom? Aligning electric utility executive compensation with climate change incentives
    Cavallaro, Cleyton M.
    Pearce, Joshua M.
    Sidortsov, Roman
    ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 37 : 153 - 162
  • [33] The Ethical Dimension of Equity Incentives: A Behavioral Agency Examination of Executive Compensation and Pension Funding
    Geoffrey P. Martin
    Robert M. Wiseman
    Luis R. Gomez-Mejia
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2020, 166 : 595 - 610
  • [34] The Ethical Dimension of Equity Incentives: A Behavioral Agency Examination of Executive Compensation and Pension Funding
    Martin, Geoffrey P.
    Wiseman, Robert M.
    Gomez-Mejia, Luis R.
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2020, 166 (03) : 595 - 610
  • [35] Do Concentrated Institutional Investors Really Reduce Executive Compensation Whilst Raising Incentives?
    Smith, Gavin S.
    Swan, Peter L.
    CRITICAL FINANCE REVIEW, 2014, 3 (01): : 49 - 83
  • [36] Agency hazard, managerial incentives, and the wealth effects of joint venture investments
    Lai, Jung-Ho
    Chen, Li-Yu
    Chen, Carl R.
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 52 : 190 - 202
  • [37] THE EFFECTS OF MANAGERIAL OWNERSHIP ON INTERNATIONAL AND BUSINESS DIVERSIFICATION: BALANCING INCENTIVES AND RISKS
    Alessandri, Todd M.
    Seth, Anju
    STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (13) : 2064 - 2075
  • [38] A Literature Review on the Dual Effect of Corporate Tax Planning and Managerial Power on Executive Compensation Structure
    Hlaing, Khin Phyo
    Stapleton, Andrea
    ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVES, 2022, 21 (02) : 387 - 423
  • [39] Is pay related to performance in The Netherlands? An analysis of Dutch executive compensation, 2002–2006
    Gerwin van der Laan
    Hans van Ees
    Arjen van Witteloostuijn
    De Economist, 2010, 158 : 123 - 149
  • [40] How Economic Incentives May Destroy Social, Ecological and Existential Values: The Case of Executive Compensation
    Ims, Knut J.
    Pedersen, Lars Jacob Tynes
    Zsolnai, Laszlo
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2014, 123 (02) : 353 - 360