Incorporation of the LETd-weighted biological dose in the evaluation of breast intensity-modulated proton therapy plans

被引:11
作者
Liu, Chunbo [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Dandan [3 ]
Bradley, Julie A. [1 ]
Mailhot Vega, Raymond B. [1 ]
Zhang, Yawei [1 ]
Indelicato, Daniel J. [1 ]
Mendenhall, Nancy [1 ]
Liang, Xiaoying [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, 2015 North Jefferson St, Jacksonville, FL 32206 USA
[2] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Phys Sci, Hefei, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Omaha, NE USA
关键词
LETd-weighted biological dose; intensity-modulated proton therapy; breast cancer; RADIATION-THERAPY; RIB FRACTURES; CANCER; MODEL; BEAM; UNCERTAINTIES; TOXICITY; INCREASE; CELLS;
D O I
10.1080/0284186X.2020.1834141
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the LETd-weighted biological dose to OARs in proton therapy for breast cancer and to study the relationship of the LETd-weighted biological dose relative to the standard dose (RBE = 1.1) and thereby to provide estimations of the biological dose uncertainties with the standard dose calculations (RBE = 1.1) commonly used in clinical practice. Method This study included 20 patients who received IMPT treatment to the whole breast/chest wall and regional lymph nodes. The LETd distributions were calculated along with the physical dose using an open-source Monte Carlo simulation package, MCsquare. Using the McMahon linear model, the LETd-weighted biological dose was computed from the physical dose and LETd. OAR doses were compared between the Dose (RBE = 1.1) and the LETd-weighted biological dose, on brachial plexus, rib, heart, esophagus, and Ipsilateral lung. Results On average, the LETd-weighted biological dose compared to the Dose (RBE = 1.1) was higher by 8% for the brachial plexus D0.1 cc, 13% for the ribs D0.5 cc, 24% for mean heart dose, and 10% for the esophagus D0.1 cc, respectively. The LETd-weighted doses to the Ipsilateral lung V5, V10, and V20 were comparable to the Dose (RBE = 1.1). No statistically significant difference in biological dose enhancement to OARs was observed between the intact breast group and the CW group, with the exception of the ribs: the CW group experienced slightly greater biological dose enhancement (13% vs. 12%,p = 0.04) to the ribs than the intact breast group. Conclusion Enhanced biological dose was observed compared to standard dose with assumed RBE of 1.1 for the heart, ribs, esophagus, and brachial plexus in breast/CW and regional nodal IMPT plans. Variable RBE models should be considered in the evaluation of the IMPT breast plans, especially for OARs located near the end of range of a proton beam. Clinical outcome studies are needed to validate model predictions for clinical toxicities.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 259
页数:8
相关论文
共 51 条
[21]   Dosimetric consequences of image guidance techniques on robust optimized intensity-modulated proton therapy for treatment of breast Cancer [J].
Liang, Xiaoying ;
Vega, Raymond B. ;
Li, Zuofeng ;
Zheng, Dandan ;
Mendenhall, Nancy ;
Bradley, Julie A. .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 15 (01)
[22]   Proton Therapy for Breast Cancer After Mastectomy: Early Outcomes of a Prospective Clinical Trial [J].
MacDonald, Shannon M. ;
Patel, Sagar A. ;
Hickey, Shea ;
Specht, Michelle ;
Isakoff, Steven J. ;
Gadd, Michele ;
Smith, Barbara L. ;
Yeap, Beow Y. ;
Adams, Judith ;
DeLaney, Thomas F. ;
Kooy, Hanne ;
Lu, Hsiao-Ming ;
Taghian, Alphonse G. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 86 (03) :484-490
[23]   LET-weighted doses effectively reduce biological variability in proton radiotherapy planning [J].
McMahon, Stephen J. ;
Paganetti, Harald ;
Prise, Kevin M. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (22)
[24]   A phenomenological relative biological effectiveness (RBE) model for proton therapy based on all published in vitro cell survival data [J].
McNamara, Aimee L. ;
Schuemann, Jan ;
Paganetti, Harald .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (21) :8399-8416
[25]   Long-term complications associated with breast-conservation surgery and radiotherapy [J].
Meric, F ;
Buchholz, TA ;
Mirza, NQ ;
Vlastos, G ;
Ames, FC ;
Ross, MI ;
Pollock, RE ;
Singletary, SE ;
Feig, BW ;
Kuerer, HM ;
Newman, LA ;
Perkins, GH ;
Strom, EA ;
McNeese, MD ;
Hortobagyi, GN ;
Hunt, KK .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 9 (06) :543-549
[26]   Differences in rates of radiation-induced true and false rib fractures after stereotactic body radiation therapy for Stage I primary lung cancer [J].
Miura, Hideharu ;
Inoue, Toshihiko ;
Shiomi, Hiroya ;
Oh, Ryoong-Jin .
JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2015, 56 (02) :332-337
[27]  
Mutter RW, 2020, PRACT RADIAT ONCOL, V10
[28]   Incorporation of relative biological effectiveness uncertainties into proton plan robustness evaluation [J].
Oden, Jakob ;
Eriksson, Kjell ;
Toma-Dasu, Iuliana .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2017, 56 (06) :769-778
[29]   Pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis associated with breast cancer treatments [J].
Omarini, Claudia ;
Thanopoulou, Eirini ;
Johnston, Stephen R. D. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2014, 146 (02) :245-258
[30]   Radiobiological significance of beamline dependent proton energy distributions in a spread-out Bragg peak [J].
Paganetti, H ;
Goitein, M .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (05) :1119-1126