Incorporation of the LETd-weighted biological dose in the evaluation of breast intensity-modulated proton therapy plans

被引:11
作者
Liu, Chunbo [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Dandan [3 ]
Bradley, Julie A. [1 ]
Mailhot Vega, Raymond B. [1 ]
Zhang, Yawei [1 ]
Indelicato, Daniel J. [1 ]
Mendenhall, Nancy [1 ]
Liang, Xiaoying [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, 2015 North Jefferson St, Jacksonville, FL 32206 USA
[2] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Phys Sci, Hefei, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Omaha, NE USA
关键词
LETd-weighted biological dose; intensity-modulated proton therapy; breast cancer; RADIATION-THERAPY; RIB FRACTURES; CANCER; MODEL; BEAM; UNCERTAINTIES; TOXICITY; INCREASE; CELLS;
D O I
10.1080/0284186X.2020.1834141
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the LETd-weighted biological dose to OARs in proton therapy for breast cancer and to study the relationship of the LETd-weighted biological dose relative to the standard dose (RBE = 1.1) and thereby to provide estimations of the biological dose uncertainties with the standard dose calculations (RBE = 1.1) commonly used in clinical practice. Method This study included 20 patients who received IMPT treatment to the whole breast/chest wall and regional lymph nodes. The LETd distributions were calculated along with the physical dose using an open-source Monte Carlo simulation package, MCsquare. Using the McMahon linear model, the LETd-weighted biological dose was computed from the physical dose and LETd. OAR doses were compared between the Dose (RBE = 1.1) and the LETd-weighted biological dose, on brachial plexus, rib, heart, esophagus, and Ipsilateral lung. Results On average, the LETd-weighted biological dose compared to the Dose (RBE = 1.1) was higher by 8% for the brachial plexus D0.1 cc, 13% for the ribs D0.5 cc, 24% for mean heart dose, and 10% for the esophagus D0.1 cc, respectively. The LETd-weighted doses to the Ipsilateral lung V5, V10, and V20 were comparable to the Dose (RBE = 1.1). No statistically significant difference in biological dose enhancement to OARs was observed between the intact breast group and the CW group, with the exception of the ribs: the CW group experienced slightly greater biological dose enhancement (13% vs. 12%,p = 0.04) to the ribs than the intact breast group. Conclusion Enhanced biological dose was observed compared to standard dose with assumed RBE of 1.1 for the heart, ribs, esophagus, and brachial plexus in breast/CW and regional nodal IMPT plans. Variable RBE models should be considered in the evaluation of the IMPT breast plans, especially for OARs located near the end of range of a proton beam. Clinical outcome studies are needed to validate model predictions for clinical toxicities.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 259
页数:8
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Initial Report of a Prospective Dosimetric and Clinical Feasibility Trial Demonstrates the Potential of Protons to Increase the Therapeutic Ratio in Breast Cancer Compared With Photons
    Bradley, Julie A.
    Dagan, Roi
    Ho, Meng Wei
    Rutenberg, Michael
    Morris, Christopher G.
    Li, Zuofeng
    Mendenhall, Nancy P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 95 (01): : 411 - 421
  • [2] Potential Morbidity Reduction With Proton Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer
    Braunstein, Lior Z.
    Cahlon, Oren
    [J]. SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 28 (02) : 138 - 149
  • [3] Range uncertainty in proton therapy due to variable biological effectiveness
    Carabe, Alejandro
    Moteabbed, Maryam
    Depauw, Nicolas
    Schuemann, Jan
    Paganetti, Harald
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (05) : 1159 - 1172
  • [4] The incorporation of the concept of minimum RBE (RBEmin) into the linear-quadratic model and the potential for improved radiobiological analysis of high-LET treatments
    Carabe-Fernandez, Alejandro
    Dale, Roger G.
    Jones, Bleddyn
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 2007, 83 (01) : 27 - 39
  • [5] THE DEPTH-DEPENDENT RADIATION RESPONSE OF HUMAN-MELANOMA CELLS EXPOSED TO 65 MEV PROTONS
    COURDI, A
    BRASSART, N
    HERAULT, J
    CHAUVEL, P
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1994, 67 (800) : 800 - 804
  • [6] Microdosimetry spectra of the Loma Linda proton beam and relative biological effectiveness comparisons
    Coutrakon, G
    Cortese, J
    Ghebremedhin, A
    Hubbard, J
    Johanning, J
    Koss, P
    Maudsley, G
    Slater, CR
    Zuccarelli, C
    Robertson, J
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (09) : 1499 - 1506
  • [7] Exponential Increase in Relative Biological Effectiveness Along Distal Edge of a Proton Bragg Peak as Measured by Deoxyribonucleic Acid Double-Strand Breaks
    Cuaron, John J.
    Chang, Chang
    Lovelock, Michael
    Higginson, Daniel S.
    Mah, Dennis
    Cahlon, Oren
    Powell, Simon
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 95 (01): : 62 - 69
  • [8] Early Toxicity in Patients Treated With Postoperative Proton Therapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer
    Cuaron, John J.
    Chon, Brian
    Tsai, Henry
    Goenka, Anuj
    DeBlois, David
    Ho, Alice
    Powell, Simon
    Hug, Eugen
    Cahlon, Oren
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 92 (02): : 284 - 291
  • [9] Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease in Women after Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer
    Darby, Sarah C.
    Ewertz, Marianne
    McGale, Paul
    Bennet, Anna M.
    Blom-Goldman, Ulla
    Bronnum, Dorthe
    Correa, Candace
    Cutter, David
    Gagliardi, Giovanna
    Gigante, Bruna
    Jensen, Maj-Britt
    Nisbet, Andrew
    Peto, Richard
    Rahimi, Kazem
    Taylor, Carolyn
    Hall, Per
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 368 (11) : 987 - 998
  • [10] Technical Note: Integrating an open source Monte Carlo code "MCsquare" for clinical use in intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Deng, Wei
    Younkin, James E.
    Souris, Kevin
    Huang, Sheng
    Augustine, Kurt
    Fatyga, Mirek
    Ding, Xiaoning
    Cohilis, Marie
    Bues, Martin
    Shan, Jie
    Stoker, Joshua
    Lin, Liyong
    Shen, Jiajian
    Liu, Wei
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : 2558 - 2574