A Stochastic Hybrid Systems framework for analysis of Markov reward models

被引:15
作者
Dhople, S. V. [1 ]
De Ville, L. [3 ]
Dominguez-Garcia, A. D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Math, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Markov availability models; Markov reliability models; Reward models; Performability analysis; Stochastic hybrid systems; PHASED-MISSION SYSTEM; COMPOSITE PERFORMANCE; RELIABILITY-MEASURES; PERFORMABILITY; DYNAMICS; MOMENTS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2013.10.011
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this paper, we propose a framework to analyze Markov reward models, which are commonly used in system performability analysis. The framework builds on a set of analytical tools developed for a class of stochastic processes referred to as Stochastic Hybrid Systems (SHS). The state space of an SHS is comprised of: (i) a discrete state that describes the possible configurations/modes that a system can adopt, which includes the nominal (non-faulty) operational mode, but also those operational modes that arise due to component faults, and (ii) a continuous state that describes the reward. Discrete state transitions are stochastic, and governed by transition rates that are (in general) a function of time and the value of the continuous state. The evolution of the continuous state is described by a stochastic differential equation and reward measures are defined as functions of the continuous state. Additionally, each transition is associated with a reset map that defines the mapping between the pre- and post-transition values of the discrete and continuous states; these mappings enable the definition of impulses and losses in the reward. The proposed SHS-based framework unifies the analysis of a variety of previously studied reward models. We illustrate the application Of the framework to performability analysis via analytical and numerical examples. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 170
页数:13
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Cost related reliability measures for power system equipment [J].
Anders, GJ ;
da Silva, AML .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2000, 15 (02) :654-660
[2]   AN IMPROVED MODEL FOR PROTECTIVE-SYSTEM RELIABILITY [J].
ANDERSON, PM ;
AGARWAL, SK .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 1992, 41 (03) :422-426
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Probability and statistics with reliability, queueing, and computer science applications
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, STOCHASTIC DIFFERENT
[5]   Second-order Markov reward models driven by QBD processes [J].
Bean, Nigel G. ;
O'Reilly, Malgorzata M. ;
Ren, Yong .
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, 2012, 69 (09) :440-455
[6]  
BEAUDRY MD, 1978, IEEE T COMPUT, V27, P540, DOI 10.1109/TC.1978.1675145
[7]  
Billingsley Patrick, 1995, Probability and Measure
[8]  
Blake J. T., 1988, Performance Evaluation Review, V16, P177, DOI 10.1145/1007771.55616
[9]   Construction of event-tree/fault-tree models from a Markov approach to dynamic system reliability [J].
Bucci, Paolo ;
Kirschenbaum, Jason ;
Mangan, L. Anthony ;
Aldemir, Tunc ;
Smith, Curtis ;
Wood, Ted .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2008, 93 (11) :1616-1627
[10]   Two methods for computing bounds for the distribution of cumulative reward for large Markov models [J].
Carrasco, Juan A. .
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, 2006, 63 (12) :1165-1195