Estimating Effects of Nursing Intervention via Propensity Score Analysis

被引:2
作者
Qin, Rui [1 ]
Tiller, Marita G.
Shever, Leah L. [2 ]
Kim, Taikyoung [3 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Biostat, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Dept Nursing Serv & Patient Care, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Coll Nursing, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
matching; nursing effectiveness research; nursing interventions; propensity score;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background:Lack of randomization of nursing intervention in outcome effectiveness studies may lead to imbalanced covariates. Consequently, estimation of nursing intervention effect can be biased as in other observational studies. Propensity score analysis is an effective statistical method to reduce such bias and further derive causal effects in observational studies. Objectives: The objective of this study was to illustrate the use of propensity score analysis in quantitative nursing research through an example of pain management effect on length of hospital stay. Methods: Propensity scores are generated through a regression model treating the nursing intervention as the dependent variable and all confounding covariates as predictor variables. Then, propensity scores are used to adjust for this non-randomized assignment of nursing intervention through three approaches: regression covariance adjustment, stratification, and matching in the predictive outcome model for nursing intervention. Results: Propensity score analysis reduces the confounding covariates into a single variable of propensity score. After stratification and matching on propensity scores observed covariates between nursing intervention groups are more balanced within each stratum or in the matched samples. The likelihood of receiving pain management is accounted for in the outcome model through the propensity scores. Both regression covariance adjustment and matching methods report a significant pain management effect on length of hospital stay in this example. The pain management effect can be regarded as causal when the strongly ignorable treatment assignment assumption holds. Discussion: Propensity score analysis provides an alternative statistical approach to the classical multivariate regression, stratification, and matching techniques for examining the effects of nursing intervention with a large number of confounding covariates in the background. It can be used to derive causal effects of nursing intervention in observational studies under certain circumstances.
引用
收藏
页码:446 / 454
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [11] DOCHTERMAN JM, 2004, NURSING INTEVENTIONS
  • [12] Herr K, 2006, EVIDENCE BASED GUIDE
  • [13] Nurse-staffing levels and the quality of care in hospitals
    Needleman, J
    Buerhaus, P
    Mattke, S
    Stewart, M
    Zelevinsky, K
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (22) : 1715 - 1722
  • [14] Perkins SM, 2000, PHARMACOEPIDEM DR S, V9, P93, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1557(200003/04)9:2<93::AID-PDS474>3.0.CO
  • [15] 2-I
  • [16] Reed David, 2007, Int J Nurs Terminol Classif, V18, P121, DOI 10.1111/j.1744-618X.2007.00067.x
  • [17] THE CENTRAL ROLE OF THE PROPENSITY SCORE IN OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES FOR CAUSAL EFFECTS
    ROSENBAUM, PR
    RUBIN, DB
    [J]. BIOMETRIKA, 1983, 70 (01) : 41 - 55
  • [18] Matching using estimated propensity scores: Relating theory to practice
    Rubin, DB
    Thomas, N
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1996, 52 (01) : 249 - 264
  • [19] Estimating the causal effects of marketing interventions using propensity score methodology
    Rubin, Donald B.
    Waterman, Richard P.
    [J]. STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 21 (02) : 206 - 222
  • [20] The effect of high nursing surveillance on hospital cost
    Shever, Leah L.
    Titler, Marita G.
    Kerr, Peg
    Qin, Rui
    Kim, Taikyoung
    Picone, Debra M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2008, 40 (02) : 161 - 169