A randomised controlled trial evaluating a rehabilitation complex intervention for patients following intensive care discharge: the RECOVER study

被引:24
|
作者
Walsh, Timothy Simon [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Salisbury, Lisa G. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Boyd, Julia [5 ]
Ramsay, Pamela [2 ,3 ,4 ,6 ]
Merriweather, Judith [2 ,3 ,4 ,6 ]
Huby, Guro [4 ]
Forbes, John [7 ]
Rattray, Janice Z. [8 ]
Griffith, David M. [2 ,3 ,6 ]
Mackenzie, Simon J. [6 ]
Hull, Alastair [9 ]
Lewis, Steff [5 ,7 ]
Murray, Gordon D. [7 ]
机构
[1] Queens Med Res Inst, Ctr Inflammat Res, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh Crit Care Res Grp, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[5] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh Clin Trials Unit, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[6] Lothian Univ Hosp Div, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[7] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Populat Hlth Sci, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[8] Univ Dundee, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Dundee, Scotland
[9] NHS Tayside, Dundee, Scotland
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2012年 / 2卷 / 04期
关键词
LONG-TERM OUTCOMES; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CRITICAL ILLNESS; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001475
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Patients who survive an intensive care unit admission frequently suffer physical and psychological morbidity for many months after discharge. Current rehabilitation pathways are often fragmented and little is known about the optimum method of promoting recovery. Many patients suffer reduced quality of life. Methods and analysis: The authors plan a multicentre randomised parallel group complex intervention trial with concealment of group allocation from outcome assessors. Patients who required more than 48 h of mechanical ventilation and are deemed fit for intensive care unit discharge will be eligible. Patients with primary neurological diagnoses will be excluded. Participants will be randomised into one of the two groups: the intervention group will receive standard ward-based care delivered by the NHS service with additional treatment by a specifically trained generic rehabilitation assistant during ward stay and via telephone contact after hospital discharge and the control group will receive standard ward-based care delivered by the current NHS service. The intervention group will also receive additional information about their critical illness and access to a critical care physician. The total duration of the intervention will be from randomisation to 3 months postrandomisation. The total duration of follow-up will be 12 months from randomisation for both groups. The primary outcome will be the Rivermead Mobility Index at 3 months. Secondary outcomes will include measures of physical and psychological morbidity and function, quality of life and survival over a 12-month period. A health economic evaluation will also be undertaken. Groups will be compared in relation to primary and secondary outcomes; quantitative analyses will be supplemented by focus groups with patients, carers and healthcare workers. Ethics and dissemination: Consent will be obtained from patients and relatives according to patient capacity. Data will be analysed according to a predefined analysis plan.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Early physical rehabilitation in intensive care patients with sepsis syndromes: a pilot randomised controlled trial
    Geetha Kayambu
    Robert Boots
    Jennifer Paratz
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2015, 41 : 865 - 874
  • [2] Early physical rehabilitation in intensive care patients with sepsis syndromes: a pilot randomised controlled trial
    Kayambu, Geetha
    Boots, Robert
    Paratz, Jennifer
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 41 (05) : 865 - 874
  • [3] Evaluating rehabilitation following lumbar fusion surgery (REFS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Greenwood, James
    McGregor, Alison
    Jones, Fiona
    Hurley, Michael
    TRIALS, 2015, 16
  • [4] Evaluating rehabilitation following lumbar fusion surgery (REFS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    James Greenwood
    Alison McGregor
    Fiona Jones
    Michael Hurley
    Trials, 16
  • [5] A supported psychoeducational intervention to improve family mental health following discharge from paediatric intensive care: feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial
    Als, Lorraine C.
    Nadel, Simon
    Cooper, Mehrengise
    Vickers, Bea
    Garralda, M. Elena
    BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (12):
  • [6] Multidisciplinary rehabilitation in intensive care for COVID-19: randomised controlled trial
    Carvalho, Ana Cristina
    Moreira, Jorge
    Cubelo, Pedro
    Cantista, Pedro
    Branco, Catarina Aguiar
    Guimaraes, Bruno
    ERJ OPEN RESEARCH, 2023, 9 (01)
  • [7] A protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of an Early Psychiatric Assessment, Referral, and Intervention Study (EPARIS) for intensive care patients
    Flaws, Dylan
    Allen, Chelsea
    Baker, Stuart
    Barnett, Adrian
    Metcalf, Olivia
    Pollock, Hamish
    Ramanan, Mahesh
    Tabah, Alexis
    Varker, Tracey
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (06):
  • [8] Evaluating an extended rehabilitation service for stroke patients (EXTRAS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Helen Rodgers
    Lisa Shaw
    Robin Cant
    Avril Drummond
    Gary A Ford
    Anne Forster
    Katie Hills
    Denise Howel
    Anne-Marie Laverty
    Christopher McKevitt
    Peter McMeekin
    Christopher Price
    Trials, 16
  • [9] Evaluating an extended rehabilitation service for stroke patients (EXTRAS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Rodgers, Helen
    Shaw, Lisa
    Cant, Robin
    Drummond, Avril
    Ford, Gary A.
    Forster, Anne
    Hills, Katie
    Howel, Denise
    Laverty, Anne-Marie
    McKevitt, Christopher
    McMeekin, Peter
    Price, Christopher
    TRIALS, 2015, 16
  • [10] Patients or research subjects? A qualitative study of participation in a randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention
    Heaven, Ben
    Murtagh, Madeleine
    Rapley, Tim
    May, Carl
    Graham, Ruth
    Kanef, Eileen
    Thomson, Richard
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2006, 62 (02) : 260 - 270