Validity of the DSM-5 Levels of Personality Functioning Scale-Self Report

被引:107
作者
Hopwood, Christopher J. [1 ]
Good, Evan W. [2 ]
Morey, Leslie C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Psychol, 135 Young Hall,One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Psychol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Psychol, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
INTERPERSONAL PROBLEMS; ALTERNATIVE MODEL; SEVERITY INDEXES; 5-FACTOR MODEL; PART I; DISORDER; INVENTORY; CLASSIFICATION; DIAGNOSIS; PATHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1080/00223891.2017.1420660
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In this study we examined the structure, reliability, and validity of the Levels of Personality Functioning Scale-Self Report (LPFS-SR) in 3 large community samples. The LPFS-SR is a questionnaire with content that corresponds directly to the DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorders, Criterion A. We found that the LPFS-SR was highly reliable across a brief retest interval. LPFS-SR scores correlated substantially with a wide range of maladaptive personality traits, personality disorder constructs, and interpersonal problems. The LPFS-SR did not correlate as strongly with aspects of personality with less clear relations to distress and dysfunction. Data further support that identity, self-direction, intimacy, and empathy components of the LPFS-SR can be characterized by a single factor and have similar correlations with criterion variables, consistent with the hypothesis that DSM-5 Criterion A is a relatively homogeneous construct. Overall, these results support the validity of the LPFS-SR, highlight important issues in assessing personality pathology, and point toward novel avenues for research on personality disorder classification.
引用
收藏
页码:650 / 659
页数:10
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, DSM 5 TASK FORCE DIA, V21, P591, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596
[2]  
[Anonymous], PERSONALITY DISORDER
[3]  
[Anonymous], STRUCTURE CORR UNPUB
[4]  
[Anonymous], PERSONALITY DISORDER
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
[6]   Toward a Model for Assessing Level of Personality Functioning in DSM-5, Part I: A Review of Theory and Methods [J].
Bender, Donna S. ;
Morey, Leslie C. ;
Skodol, Andrew E. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2011, 93 (04) :332-346
[7]  
Bornstein RF, 1998, CLIN PSYCHOL-SCI PR, V5, P333
[8]   Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data? [J].
Buhrmester, Michael ;
Kwang, Tracy ;
Gosling, Samuel D. .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 6 (01) :3-5
[9]  
Carter MJ, 2014, THER RECREAT J, V48, P275
[10]   Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon's MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing [J].
Casler, Krista ;
Bickel, Lydia ;
Hackett, Elizabeth .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2013, 29 (06) :2156-2160