It's just too hard! Australian health care practitioner perspectives on barriers to advance care planning

被引:49
作者
Boddy, Jennifer [1 ,2 ]
Chenoweth, Lesley [1 ,2 ]
McLennan, Vanette [1 ,2 ]
Daly, Michelle [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Sch Human Serv & Social Work, Southport, Qld 4222, Australia
[2] Griffith Hlth Inst, Populat & Social Hlth Res Program, Southport, Qld 4222, Australia
[3] Queensland Hlth, Gold Coast Hlth Serv Dist, Southport, Qld 4215, Australia
关键词
advance directive; aging; enduring power of attorney; focus groups; OLDER-PEOPLE; DIRECTIVES; ATTITUDES; LIFE; END; EXPERIENCE; KNOWLEDGE; PROFESSIONALS; BEHAVIOR; ASSETS;
D O I
10.1071/PY11070
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This article presents findings from six focus groups with health care practitioners in an Australian hospital during 2010, which sought to elicit their perspectives on the barriers for people to plan their future health care should they become unwell. Such knowledge is invaluable in overcoming the barriers associated with advance care planning and enhancing the uptake of advance directives and the appointment of an enduring power of attorney for people of all ages. A person's rights to self-determination in health care, including decision making about their wishes for future care in the event they lose cognitive capacity, should not be overlooked against the backdrop of increasing pressure on health care systems. Findings suggest that multiple barriers exist, from practitioners' perspectives, which can be divided into three major categories, namely: patient-centred, practitioner-centred and system-centred barriers. Specifically, patient-centred barriers include lack of knowledge, accessibility concerns, the small 'window of opportunity' to discuss advance care planning, emotional reactions and avoidance when considering one's mortality, and demographic influences. At the practitioner level, barriers relate to a lack of knowledge and uncertainty around advance care planning processes. Systemically, legislative barriers (including a lack of a central registry and conflicting state legislation), procedural issues (particularly in relation to assessing cognitive capacity and making decisions ad hoc) and questions about delegation, roles and responsibilities further compound the barriers to advance care planning.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 45
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], AUSTR SOCIAL WORK
[2]   Uncovering Beliefs and Barriers: Staff Attitudes Related to Advance Directives [J].
Bergman-Evans, Brenda ;
Kuhnel, Leslie ;
McNitt, Denise ;
Myers, Suzanne .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 25 (05) :347-353
[3]   Health care professionals' death attitudes, experiences, and advance directive communication behavior [J].
Black, Kathy .
DEATH STUDIES, 2007, 31 (06) :563-572
[4]   Documenting end of life decisions in residential aged care facilities in South Australia [J].
Brown, M ;
Grbich, C ;
Maddocks, I ;
Parker, D ;
Roe, P ;
Willis, E .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2005, 29 (01) :85-90
[5]  
Brown M, 2008, J LAW MED, V15, P530
[6]   End-of-life decision making: Practical and ethical issues for health professionals [J].
Cartwright, C .
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2000, 19 (02) :57-62
[7]   Advance care planning in Australia: challenges of a federal legislative system [J].
Cartwright, Colleen .
PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE, 2007, 15 (03) :113-117
[8]  
Cartwright Colleen M, 2004, Aust Fam Physician, V33, P815
[9]   Why don't patients and physicians talk about end-of-life care?: Barriers to communication for patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and their primary care clinicians [J].
Curtis, JR ;
Patrick, DL ;
Caldwell, ES ;
Collier, AC .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 160 (11) :1690-1696
[10]  
Denzin N.K., 2000, Handbook of Qualitative Research, V2