Bit by bit or all at once? Splitting up the inquiry task to promote children's scientific reasoning

被引:29
作者
Lazonder, Ard W. [1 ]
Kamp, Ellen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Dept Instruct Technol, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
Scientific reasoning; Inquiry learning; Computer simulations; Control of variables; GOAL SPECIFICITY; STRATEGY USE; SKILLS; EXPERIMENTATION; INSTRUCTION; ELEMENTARY; KNOWLEDGE; PERSPECTIVE; HYPOTHESIS; VARIABLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.005
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study examined whether and why assigning children to a segmented inquiry task makes their investigations more productive. Sixty-one upper elementary-school pupils engaged in a simulation-based inquiry assignment either received a multivariable inquiry task (n = 21), a segmented version of this task that addressed the variables in successive order (n = 21), or could formulate a task themselves (n = 19). Results showed that children are naturally inclined to pose single-variable inquiry questions. Segmented tasks, in addition, invoked more systematic but equally comprehensive investigations than a single, unsegmented task. More systematic experimentation was associated with more valid inferences and beliefs. These findings demonstrate that dividing a multivariable inquiry task into a series of single-variable subtasks facilitates the control of variables rather than the control of the learning process, and promotes inference performance and conceptual understanding. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:458 / 464
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, NAT SCI ED STAND
[2]   The effects of training wheels and self-learning materials in software training [J].
Bannert, M .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2000, 16 (04) :336-346
[3]   Goal specificity effects on hypothesis testing in problem solving [J].
Burns, BD ;
Vollmeyer, R .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 55 (01) :241-261
[4]   BLOCKING LEARNER ERROR STATES IN A TRAINING-WHEELS SYSTEM [J].
CARROLL, JM ;
CARRITHERS, C .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1984, 26 (04) :377-389
[5]   Scientific reasoning in a real-world context: The effect of prior belief and outcome on children's hypothesis-testing strategies [J].
Croker, Steve ;
Buchanan, Heather .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 29 (03) :409-424
[6]   Supporting reflective web searching in elementary schools [J].
de Vries, Bregje ;
van der Meij, Hans ;
Lazonder, Ard W. .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2008, 24 (03) :649-665
[7]   Direct instruction vs. discovery: The long view [J].
Dean, David, Jr. ;
Kuhn, Deanna .
SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2007, 91 (03) :384-397
[8]   Developmental change in notetaking during scientific inquiry [J].
Garcia-Mila, Merce ;
Andersen, Christopher .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2007, 29 (08) :1035-1058
[9]  
Inhelder B., 1958, The Growth of Logical Thinking from Childhood to Adolescence: An Essay on the Construction of Formal Operational Structures, V22
[10]   Early science instruction - Addressing fundamental issues [J].
Klahr, D .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 16 (11) :871-872