The responsibility for carbon emissions and carbon efficiency at the sectoral level: Evidence from China

被引:36
作者
Zhang, Youguo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Social Sci, Inst Quantitat & Tech Econ, Beijing 100732, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Social Sci, Ctr Environm & Dev, Beijing 100732, Peoples R China
关键词
Environmental responsibility; Emissions multiplier; Benefit principle; Input-output analysis; INPUT-OUTPUT-ANALYSIS; PRODUCER ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY; CO2; EMISSIONS; CONSUMER RESPONSIBILITY; TRADE; AGGREGATION; CONSUMPTION; INCOME;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2013.05.025
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This work reviews benefit-based principles to measuring responsibility for carbon emissions at the sectoral level using environmental input-output analysis. Several new emissions multipliers are proposed to measure sectoral carbon efficiency. These principles are used in an empirical analysis of carbon emissions in China, and differences between the principles are compared. The results indicate that all principles considered can prevent double-counting of emissions but that different principles may lead to significantly different attributions of responsibility for carbon emissions and to different multiplier values for particular sectors. Electricity and heat supply is found to be the sector with the highest emissions responsibility under all but the consumer responsibility principle, as well as the highest carbon multiplier under all principles. However, this sector's responsibility under producer responsibility principles is greater than that under other principles. Basic metals and transportation and post and telecommunication are among the top five sectors with the greatest responsibilities under all but the consumer responsibility principle, whereas construction has the highest consumer responsibility among all sectors. The pros and cons and policy implications of each principle are also discussed. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:967 / 975
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   APPROXIMATION AND REGIONAL AGGREGATION IN MULTI-REGIONAL INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS FOR NATIONAL CARBON FOOTPRINT ACCOUNTING [J].
Andrew, Robbie ;
Peters, Glen P. ;
Lennox, James .
ECONOMIC SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2009, 21 (03) :311-335
[2]   A three-perspective view of greenhouse gas emission responsibilities in New Zealand [J].
Andrew, Robbie ;
Forgie, Vicky .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 68 (1-2) :194-204
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, EXTENDED PRODUCER RE
[4]   The problem of assigning responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions [J].
Bastianoni, S ;
Pulselli, FM ;
Tiezzi, E .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 49 (03) :253-257
[5]   Interregional multipliers: Looking backward, looking forward [J].
Dietzenbacher, E .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2002, 36 (02) :125-136
[6]   What environmental pressures are a region's industries responsible for? A method of analysis with descriptive indices and input-output models [J].
Eder, P ;
Narodoslawsky, M .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 29 (03) :359-374
[7]   Allocating the responsibility of CO2 over-emissions from the perspectives of benefit principle and ecological deficit [J].
Ferng, JJ .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 46 (01) :121-141
[8]  
Gallego B., 2005, ECON SYST RES, V17, P365, DOI DOI 10.1080/09535310500283492
[9]   INPUT-OUTPUT APPROACH IN AN ALLOCATION SYSTEM [J].
GHOSH, A .
ECONOMICA, 1958, 25 (97) :58-64
[10]   Economic, energy and greenhouse emissions impacts of some consumer choice, technology and government outlay options [J].
Lenzen, M ;
Dey, CJ .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2002, 24 (04) :377-403