The Pros and Cons of Identifying Critical Thinking with System 2 Processing

被引:28
作者
Bonnefon, Jean-Francois [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toulouse Capitole, CNRS, Toulouse Sch Econ, Ctr Res Management,Inst Adv Study Toulouse, 21 Allee Brienne, F-31015 Toulouse 6, France
来源
TOPOI-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY | 2018年 / 37卷 / 01期
关键词
Critical thinking; Dual-process; Debiasing; Rationalization; Morality; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; DECISION-MAKING; MORAL JUDGMENT; COGNITIVE REFLECTION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS; SELECTION TASK; UTILITARIAN; ABILITY; BIASES; STYLE;
D O I
10.1007/s11245-016-9375-2
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
The dual-process model of cognition but most especially its reflective component, system 2 processing, shows strong conceptual links with critical thinking. In fact, the salient characteristics of system 2 processing are so strikingly close to that of critical thinking, that it is tempting to claim that critical thinking is system 2 processing, no more and no less. In this article, I consider the two sides of that claim: Does critical thinking always require system 2 processing? And does system 2 processing always result in critical thinking? I argue that it is plausible and helpful to consider that critical thinking requires system 2 processing. In particular, this assumption can provide interesting insights and benchmarks for critical thinking education. On the other hand, I show that system 2 processing can result in a range of outcomes which are either contradictory with critical thinking, or of debatable social desirability-which suggests that there is more to critical thinking than mere system 2 processing, and more to system 2 processing than just critical thinking.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 119
页数:7
相关论文
共 54 条
[31]  
Lotito G., 2012, J BIOECON, V15, P123, DOI DOI 10.1007/s10818-012-9141-5
[32]   Think-aloud protocols and the selection task: Evidence for relevance effects and rationalisation processes [J].
Lucas, EJ ;
Ball, LJ .
THINKING & REASONING, 2005, 11 (01) :35-66
[33]   The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "frontal lobe" tasks: A latent variable analysis [J].
Miyake, A ;
Friedman, NP ;
Emerson, MJ ;
Witzki, AH ;
Howerter, A ;
Wager, TD .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 41 (01) :49-100
[34]   Who shalt not kill? Individual differences in working memory capacity, executive control, and moral judgment [J].
Moore, Adam B. ;
Clark, Brian A. ;
Kane, Michael J. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2008, 19 (06) :549-557
[35]   A unified framework for inhibitory control [J].
Munakata, Yuko ;
Herd, Seth A. ;
Chatham, Christopher H. ;
Depue, Brendan E. ;
Banich, Marie T. ;
O'Reilly, Randall C. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2011, 15 (10) :453-459
[36]   Second thoughts on free riding [J].
Nielsen, Ulrik H. ;
Tyran, Jean-Robert ;
Wengstrom, Erik .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2014, 122 (02) :136-139
[37]   Putting brain training to the test [J].
Owen, Adrian M. ;
Hampshire, Adam ;
Grahn, Jessica A. ;
Stenton, Robert ;
Dajani, Said ;
Burns, Alistair S. ;
Howard, Robert J. ;
Ballard, Clive G. .
NATURE, 2010, 465 (7299) :775-U6
[38]   What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement [J].
Pennycook, Gordon ;
Fugelsang, Jonathan A. ;
Koehler, Derek J. .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 80 :34-72
[39]   Cognitive style and religiosity: The role of conflict detection [J].
Pennycook, Gordon ;
Cheyne, James Allan ;
Barr, Nathaniel ;
Koehler, Derek J. ;
Fugelsang, Jonathan A. .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2014, 42 (01) :1-10
[40]   Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief [J].
Pennycook, Gordon ;
Cheyne, James Allan ;
Seli, Paul ;
Koehler, Derek J. ;
Fugelsang, Jonathan A. .
COGNITION, 2012, 123 (03) :335-346