The Pros and Cons of Identifying Critical Thinking with System 2 Processing

被引:27
作者
Bonnefon, Jean-Francois [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toulouse Capitole, CNRS, Toulouse Sch Econ, Ctr Res Management,Inst Adv Study Toulouse, 21 Allee Brienne, F-31015 Toulouse 6, France
来源
TOPOI-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY | 2018年 / 37卷 / 01期
关键词
Critical thinking; Dual-process; Debiasing; Rationalization; Morality; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; DECISION-MAKING; MORAL JUDGMENT; COGNITIVE REFLECTION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS; SELECTION TASK; UTILITARIAN; ABILITY; BIASES; STYLE;
D O I
10.1007/s11245-016-9375-2
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
The dual-process model of cognition but most especially its reflective component, system 2 processing, shows strong conceptual links with critical thinking. In fact, the salient characteristics of system 2 processing are so strikingly close to that of critical thinking, that it is tempting to claim that critical thinking is system 2 processing, no more and no less. In this article, I consider the two sides of that claim: Does critical thinking always require system 2 processing? And does system 2 processing always result in critical thinking? I argue that it is plausible and helpful to consider that critical thinking requires system 2 processing. In particular, this assumption can provide interesting insights and benchmarks for critical thinking education. On the other hand, I show that system 2 processing can result in a range of outcomes which are either contradictory with critical thinking, or of debatable social desirability-which suggests that there is more to critical thinking than mere system 2 processing, and more to system 2 processing than just critical thinking.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 119
页数:7
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, What intelligence tests miss: The psychology of rational thought
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, two minds: Dual processes and beyond, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199230167.003.0003
[3]   Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making [J].
Bartels, Daniel M. .
COGNITION, 2008, 108 (02) :381-417
[4]   Non-Reflective Thinkers Are Predisposed to Attribute Supernatural Causation to Uncanny Experiences [J].
Bouvet, Romain ;
Bonnefon, Jean-Francois .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2015, 41 (07) :955-961
[5]   Deontological and Utilitarian Inclinations in Moral Decision Making: A Process Dissociation Approach [J].
Conway, Paul ;
Gawronski, Bertram .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 104 (02) :216-235
[6]   Emotion and deliberative reasoning in moral judgment [J].
Cummins, Denise Dellarosa ;
Cummins, Robert C. .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 3
[7]   Smarter than we think: When our brains detect that we are biased [J].
De Neys, Wim ;
Vartanian, Oshin ;
Goel, Vinod .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2008, 19 (05) :483-489
[8]   Conflict detection, dual processes, and logical intuitions: Some clarifications [J].
De Neys, Wim .
THINKING & REASONING, 2014, 20 (02) :169-187
[9]   The 'whys' and 'whens' of individual differences in thinking biases [J].
De Neys, Wim ;
Bonnefon, Jean-Francois .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2013, 17 (04) :172-178
[10]   Cognitive Control and Individual Differences in Economic Ultimatum Decision-Making [J].
De Neys, Wim ;
Novitskiy, Nikolay ;
Geeraerts, Leen ;
Ramautar, Jennifer ;
Wagemans, Johan .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (11)