Overview of JET results in support of the ITER physics basis

被引:12
作者
Adams, JM [1 ]
Ageladarakis, P
Alper, B
Altmann, H
Arshad, S
Bainbridge, N
Balet, B
Baranov, Y
Barker, P
Barnsley, R
Bartlett, DV
Begue, ML
Bell, AC
Bertalot, L
Bertolini, E
Beurskens, M
Bevil, C
Bickley, AJ
Bigi, M
Bird, S
Blackler, K
Bond, D
Borba, D
Brandon, M
Brelen, H
Brennan, P
Brewerton, WJ
Brix, M
Browne, ML
Budd, T
Budny, R
Butcher, P
Buttery, R
Caldwell-Nichols, C
Campling, D
Card, P
Challis, CD
Chankin, AV
Charlet, M
Chen, H
Chiron, D
Christiansen, J
Ciric, D
Clement, S
Coad, JP
Coffey, I
Conroy, S
Conway, G
Cooper, S
Cordey, JG
机构
[1] UKAEA, Harwell Lab, Harwell OX11 0RA, Berks, England
[2] Jet Joint Undertaking, Abingdon OX14 3EA, Oxon, England
[3] AF Ioffe Inst, Moscow, Russia
[4] Univ Leicester, Leicester, Leics, England
[5] CEA, Cadarache, France
[6] ENEA, Frascati, Italy
[7] Forschungszentrum Julich, D-5170 Julich, Germany
[8] Princeton Plasma Phys Lab, Princeton, NJ 08543 USA
[9] Uppsala Univ, Dept Neutron Res, Uppsala, Sweden
[10] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[11] Univ Manchester, Inst Sci & Technol, Manchester M60 1QD, Lancs, England
[12] Lund Univ, Lund, Sweden
[13] Gen Atom Co, San Diego, CA 92138 USA
[14] Helsinki Univ Technol, Helsinki, Finland
[15] Univ Toronto, Inst Aerosp Studies, Toronto, ON, Canada
[16] Univ Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XQ, Lanark, Scotland
[17] IPP Garching, Garching, Germany
[18] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, CRPP, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[19] Royal Inst Technol, Stockholm, Sweden
[20] Univ London, Imperial Coll, London, England
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0029-5515/41/10/303
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
The JET experimental campaign has focused on studies in support of the ITER physics basis. An overview of the results obtained is given for the reference ELMy H mode and advanced scenarios, which in JET are based on internal transport barriers. JET studies for ELMy H mode have been instrumental in the definition of ITER FEAT. Positive elongation and current scaling in the ITER scaling law have been confirmed, but the observed density scaling fits a two term (core and edge) model better. Significant progress in neoclassical tearing mode limits has been made showing that ITER operation with q(95) around 3.3 seems to be optimized. Effective helium pumping and divertor enrichment is found to be well within ITER requirements. Target asymmetries and hydrogen isotope retention are well simulated by modelling codes taking into account drift flows in the scrape-off plasmas. Striking improvements in fuelling effectiveness have been made with the new high field pellet launch facility. Good progress has been made on scenarios for achieving good confinement at high densities, both with radiation improved modes and with high field side pellets. Significant development of advanced scenarios, in view of their application to ITER, has been achieved. Progress towards integrated advanced scenarios is well developed with edge pressure control (impurity radiation). An access domain has been explored showing, in particular, that the power threshold increases with magnetic field but can be significantly reduced when lower hybrid current drive is used to produce target plasmas with negative shear. The role of ion pressure peaking on MHD has been well documented. Lack of sufficient additional heating power and interaction with the septum at high beta prevents assessment of the beta limits (steady plasmas achieved with beta (N) up to 2.6). Plasmas with a non-inductive current (I(NI)/I(p) = 60%), well aligned with the plasma current, high beta and good confinement have also been obtained.
引用
收藏
页码:1327 / 1340
页数:14
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
ALPER B, 1999, CONTROLLED FUSION PL, V23, P205
[2]   An international pellet ablation database [J].
Baylor, LR ;
Geraud, A ;
Houlberg, WA ;
Frigione, D ;
Gadeberg, M ;
Jernigan, TC ;
DeKloe, J ;
Kupschus, P ;
Kuteev, BV ;
Lang, P ;
Oomens, AAM ;
Qualls, AL ;
Sato, KN ;
Schmidt, GL .
NUCLEAR FUSION, 1997, 37 (04) :445-450
[3]  
BURATTI P, 2000, FUSION ENERGY 2000 P
[4]   Neoclassical tearing modes [J].
Buttery, RJ ;
Günter, S ;
Giruzzi, G ;
Hender, TC ;
Howell, D ;
Huysmans, G ;
La Haye, RJ ;
Maraschek, M ;
Reimerdes, H ;
Sauter, O ;
Warrick, CD ;
Wilson, HR ;
Zohm, H .
PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 2000, 42 :B61-B73
[5]  
CHALLIS CD, 2001, CONTROLLED FUSION PL
[6]  
CHANKIN AV, IN PRESS J NUCL MAT
[7]  
COAD JP, IN PRESS J NUCL MAT
[8]   High performance tokamak operation regimes [J].
Gormezano, C .
PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 1999, 41 :B367-B380
[9]  
GORMEZANO C, 2001, CONTROLLED FUSION PL
[10]  
GORMEZANO C, 1996, FUSION ENERGY 1996, V1, P487